I doubt that it will be enough. I do not expect the performance to match exactly and then you're left with "oh, the Nvidia card is 10% faster and has better production software support, maybe I want to try Ai?" --> Nvidia it is
I think AMD and Nvidia are currently slowly killing PC gaming...
This is kind of where I'm at, too. Expecting something in between a 5070 and 5070 Ti in performance. More on level of CNN DLSS, no MFG, less performant RT. $650 for a decent brand like Sapphire or PowerColor would be highly appealing.Every has their own ideas of what's enough, though. 9070 XT at $600 against 5070ti is enough for me going with what else (we think) we know. You can't help but compare it to the 5070 at that price and for $50 more it's very good as long as you consider buying amd in the first place.
...
The non-xt branding drives me nuts. Does anyone else feel like it gives off annairt of being a nerfed 'xt' instead of a proper stablemate? I don't know why that doesn't seem no happen with 'ti' branding. The non-xt models seem to fade into the background. They even seem to have less stock on average.
This time nonXT is very good, and up 7900XT perf. Also based on price screens seems ~150$ difference between nonXT and XTThe non-xt models seem to fade into the background. They even seem to have less stock on average.
Unboxing from the above redditer, on X (Youtube video was taken down)
This is kind of where I'm at, too. Expecting something in between a 5070 and 5070 Ti in performance. More on level of CNN DLSS, no MFG, less performant RT. $650 for a decent brand like Sapphire or PowerColor would be highly appealing.
Understandable. Of course it all depends on the performance. $650 for a Nitro+ or Red Devil would be impulse buy territory for me if it's in between a 5070 and 5070 Ti. $750usd MSRP with the premium cards going for $800-900 would be a tragedy.I'd want more like $600 for xt to say "wow".
Actually available to buy at $650 isn't crazy right this minute, though.
The latest we're seeing is hopefully placeholder prices of $650/$750. That's not working for me. Is that the "mid range" they've been talking up all this time? So how much do they want for a 9060XT?!?
The 6900GRE was $550 and now the "8800XT" would be $750? What are they doing with the product stack? What are you supposed to get for $300? An 8gb 9050?
?There is safety in numbers. Never buy parts that are out of the mainstream. Your custom parts will have custom issues that don't have workarounds. Safety in numbers, benchmarks be damned.
Yeah buy a 7900xtx If you don't want FSR 4.0 and worse Raytracing performance with more Vram.Buy 7900 xtx while its still around 1000
It will cost more after 9xxx release
Yeah buy a 7900xtx If you don't want FSR 4.0 and worse Raytracing performance with more Vram.
9070 nonXT
![]()
Did you read it? it's ML/FP16/FP32 perfSo based on this 9070 non XT will be almost on par with 7900XTX/4080. You really believe this?
Did you read it? it's ML/FP16/FP32 perf
Gaming is hereIt's running on shader cores? So it's related to overall performance of GPU more or less.
Is that good?9070 nonXT
![]()
VeryIs that good?
Time to invest in AMD. StonksGaming is here
![]()
Can you ball park it for me a bit?Very
Let's hope for good availability for the 9070 cards.
Did exactly that yesterday.Buy 7900 xtx while its still around 1000
It will cost more after 9xxx release
Guess I don't understand why anybody would buy a 9070 XT (assuming it has comparable performance to RTX 4080), for $750.
Aside from it being in stock... BUT if that's the case seems like a sacrifice that isn't worth it in the long run.
Yes. And I don't see how Nvidia will be able to outmanoeuvre AMD this time. 5070 will barely be an improvement over the 4070 Super and very likely will be higher priced. MSRPs can be ignored for the 50 series, they are pure fiction.4080 cards are not available any more, and 5070 Ti with comparable performance costs over 1000 eur in Europe. If 9070 XT is under 900 eur it starts making sense. There are plenty of people who don't care about DLSS or RTX shenanigans.
There were still 5070 Ti cards selling at MSRP at launch. So really it just depends on supply as whether the price can be retained for the vanilla (non-OC) models.Yes. And I don't see how Nvidia will be able to outmanoeuvre AMD this time. 5070 will barely be an improvement over the 4070 Super and very likely will be higher priced. MSRPs can be ignored for the 50 series, they are pure fiction.
That mean CU's are strong in RDNA4Can you ball park it for me a bit?
4080 cards are not available any more, and 5070 Ti with comparable performance costs over 1000 eur in Europe. If 9070 XT is under 900 eur it starts making sense. There are plenty of people who don't care about DLSS or RTX shenanigans.
I think it's gonna be like 480(500)\600. Both faster than 5070 for 550(real msrp think going to 700+)Nvidia will struggle to compete. 550 (or even 600 I'd argue) for 4080S performance
Yep, price the card for even $600 for vanilla and $650ish for AIB, make it actually available and they have once in a decade chance to grab market share. A lot of people are tired of Nvidia’s shenanigans.Hardware Unboxed is making a very clear point:
AMD has the chance of a lifetime to take market/mindshare away from Nvidia, with a card that should outperform the green counterpart and could be priced much lower.
The question is whether AMD is actually interested in playing this game seriously or not. If not, they'll probably price it much closer to the 5000 series, maybe $50/70 cheaper than each one and calling it a day, hoping the lack of stock might help them move all of their initial cards and maybe lower the price when Nvidia is able to keep up with the demand. This has been their strategy and it's been a failure.
Their alternative is to lower their margins on each cards, ignore the state of the market and price the card so aggressively Nvidia will struggle to compete. 550 (or even 600 I'd argue) for 4080S performance would disrupt the market and make not only the 5070 and 5070ti look bad, but also the 5080. At this price difference, all the Nvidia advantages more or less disappear. Because RT and better upscaling is worth 15-20% more, not 35-40%.
This is a risky move with the AI market still hot, but I think it might really pay in both sales (lower margins but higher volume) and in securing a future in the GPU market. Ryzen started more or less like this: it wasn't THE BEST, but offered the best value by far
It’s depressing that nowadays this is competitive with team green. I think that my 1060 6GB costed like 300€.So €730 to €800 with VAT.
It’s depressing that nowadays this is competitive with team green. I think that my 1060 6GB costed like 300€.
Are we pretending the price of everything else didn't double in the same time frame too?This is the price that consumers pay, when there is no competition between companies.
Both Nvidia and TSMC have no proper competition, so they jacked up prices as much as their greed desired.
This is what I’m hoping for. $500 9070, $550 premium AIB 9070. Then $600 9070 XT, $650 premium AIB.Yep, price the card for even $600 for vanilla and $650ish for AIB, make it actually available and they have once in a decade chance to grab market…
I still doubt they'll take the opportunity as previous gens have shown us, but either way it's a win/win for meThat hub tweet gives me some hope. If amd is actually contacting them about the price, they are actively getting the same arguments we're making in here. Kinda adds some context.
Are we pretending the price of everything else didn't double in the same time frame too?
Have you looked at the price of everything else lately before making your pronouncement about greed and capitalism?
We're so cooked. I hate AIBs.P.S.- iirc there isn’t a AMD reference being sold, it’s all custom AIB.
There still PowerColor Reaper/Sapphire PulseI hate AIBs.
Yeah, there are several decent brands. And AMD reference cards had some issues with the 7900 series.There still PowerColor Reaper/Sapphire Pulse