DarkLordMalik
Member
I was wondering that too.Huh, seems like electroplankton got banned.
Also it was definitely strange to see Yakuza 1 & 2 HD on Wii U. Is the Yakuza story linked or is each game different from the other?
I was wondering that too.Huh, seems like electroplankton got banned.
They're linked I think. I've only played 3; it presented the backstory of 1 and 2 in cutscenes. I'm not sure how much 4 and 5 follow on.I was wondering that too.
Also it was definitely strange to see Yakuza 1 & 2 HD on Wii U. Is the Yakuza story linked or is each game different from the other?
Huh, seems like electroplankton got banned.
so next week sales-age won't see his usual "Vita is doomed" topic
The only reason the Yakuza 1 & 2 HD port makes sense is if Nintendo helps bring it to the west.
Or if they intend to bring next Yakuza game to Wii U.
I don't know if that would be a good idea since most of that series fanbase is already on ps3.
what would be their incentive to switch consoles at this point?
while its true that wii u can use every single game it can get,it needs new unique games instead of just remakes and old ports. HD or not , awesome or not as they may be.
Or if they intend to bring next Yakuza game to Wii U.
Nagoshi has already indicated that the next installment won't be on PS3, iirc. It could suggest multiplatform PS4/Wii U.PS3 is still strong, but no way Sega can expect 600k/700k sales on PS4 alone, at least not until userbase grows, so next game may be PS3/Wii U.
Overreaction much?Seriously, if you can't accept reality with Wii U you'd better stay away from posting in sales threads.
Hate? Give me a break. An port of an old Yakuza PS3 HD collection on a Nintendo console will sell almost zero.
Overreaction much?
I was wondering that too.
No shit? Chris always talks with a pole up his arse though lol.No that's him being as real as possible. When it comes to data, there are no biases. Only cold, hard facts whether we like them or not.
I don't really understand the HD collection unless there's intent to release 3-5 as well and then release 6 across both the PS4 and Wii U. It would have made more sense to port the latter, since as mentioned above 3 already details the 1&2 backstory.
Well, that took some time, lol. I don't think it was the reason, he also admitted to never owning a VITA in NPD thread yet he always target it in every thread.If I had to guess it would be this poor attempt at trolling the Vita. Typical pathetic fanboy ramblings.
That's what surprises me as well. Yakuza 6 will be likely shown at TGS and Yakuza 1 & 2 are releasing in August(?). There is just a lot to miss here for Wii U Yakuza fans and then we have got the hardware gap between Wii U and PS4.I don't really understand the HD collection unless there's intent to release 3-5 as well and then release 6 across both the PS4 and Wii U. It would have made more sense to port the latter, since as mentioned above 3 already details the 1&2 backstory.
Pikmin 3's preorders just started, and it's already first on Amazon.co.jp. That's something, no?
Nagoshi has already indicated that the next installment won't be on PS3, iirc. It could suggest multiplatform PS4/Wii U.
But 1&2 HD doesn't really suggest that 6 will be on Wii U; there's still 3 games absent from the platform. It will also in all likelihood completely bomb; which really won't help the case for a Wii U SKU of 6.
Yakuza is a series which sold in the 800-900k range on the PS2. It's mostly been down in the 500-600k range on the PS3, despite increased costs.
If I had to guess, I'd say it probably has to do with Sega wanting to find another outlet for sales for the series - and they're not expecting the west to provide an adequate outlet - so that leaves...
Yakuza is a series which sold in the 800-900k range on the PS2. It's mostly been down in the 500-600k range on the PS3, despite increased costs. Moving on to the PS4, costs can be expected to rise again, but I don't see any reason to believe that sales will be significantly better than what they've had on the PS3. And I can't imagine that the series has been doing much better than fairly small, but not terribly significant profits with their PS3 iterations.
It's a series that Sega definitely wants to continue in the future, but sales in the 500k range just won't cut it with another bump in dev costs. They need to find another avenue to boost sales. They seem convinced that localizing the game for the west costs more than the potential returns - so that leaves trying to grow the series on the WiiU (or maybe going portable - which seems unlikely) in an attempt to expand the customer base in Japan.
Seriously, if you can't accept reality with Wii U you'd better stay away from posting in sales threads.
Hate? Give me a break. An port of an old Yakuza PS3 HD collection on a Nintendo console will sell almost zero.
I hope Yakuza goes multiplatform and I mean next XBox too so we'll have more chances to see it in the US and EU, but I doubt it, since the series success is only limited to Japan.
Wii Fit U was submitted for classification ratings months ago, we know Wonderful 101 has been essentially finished for weeks now from comments out of Platinum and G&W was released in Japan in March, and likely complete much earlier. It's not development issues, Nintendo's strategically holding titles back to bolster the 2nd half.
I was always of the mindset that we need to see how the Wii U performs post big game releases and price drop...
...just fucking kill it. Pause production and prepare for a move to a different platform. Offer an apology and then a trade up program.
Only 4 million out there anyway, so the losses wouldn't be as catastrophic as dumping money onto a sunk ship.
Wii Fit U was submitted for classification ratings months ago, we know Wonderful 101 has been essentially finished for weeks now from comments out of Platinum and G&W was released in Japan in March, and likely complete much earlier. It's not development issues, Nintendo's strategically holding titles back to bolster the 2nd half.
Huh, seems like electroplankton got banned.
That's just not true. SmokeyDave loves his Vita and is very optimistic about it, but he is not wont to write spiteful posts about competing platforms in the manner that Electroplankton was. I don't think you'll find bickering of this kind from him.Also Electroplankton is always targeted by people but he's no worse than SmokeyDave or 75% of the people who post in MH/Vita Threads. He's just less subtle about it.
:lolThe ghost of Laguna will now find its next vessel.
GTA sells quite well in Japan.GTAV PS3 hold the 1st position for 4 days...
No shit? Chris always talks with a pole up his arse though lol.
but he is not wont to write spiteful posts about competing platforms in the manner that Electroplankton was.
but he is not wont to write spiteful posts about competing platforms in the manner that Electroplankton was.
That's just not true. SmokeyDave loves his Vita and is very optimistic about it, but he is not wont to write spiteful posts about competing platforms in the manner that Electroplankton was.
Overreaction much?
Personally, I'm happy to see the Yakuza franchise getting some more exposure - it won't set the world on fire, but I never expected it outside a Sony platform. I wonder if this could mean something for fans from the West since we didn't get a HD re-release (and 5 for that matter!)
This is some grade A bs lol.
At least Smokey Dave has a sense of humour and laughs at himself on occasion.
Would it be a bad idea for Nintendo to create its own scalable, corporation-wide proprietary engine? Not likely going to happen, but I'm just thinking.
In today's Nintendo Direct they were showing off Game and Wario, Pikmin 3, and The Wonderful 101. All supposed "launch window" games. Wii Fit U fallen even further away from when it was expected. This suggests that Nintendo's been having development issues.
Having all or most of their games run on the same engine should keep budgets down while allowing them to release titles in a more timely way. Having the team that designs the engine collaborate with the team that designs the hardware might also help prevent issues like the Wii U delays.
On top of that, they could offer free use of the engine to Wii U developers, same as their current Unity deal. It wouldn't be appealing to the big companies, but it might be helpful for indie developers.
And yet Nintendo obviously doesn't get half the furious shit thrown at it that Ubisoft did. People "understand" when its Nintendo playing business tactics.
I wasn't defending anyone, and I agree there is no need for that. I was simply providing my impression. I do believe that there is a very significant difference between "taunting" a platform in a thread related to some aspect clearly worth taunting (e.g. sales for Vita and specs for 3DS) and doing so in a thread about a game (that is not even for the platform).I think Dave neither needs your defense nor is your post accurate; he likes to taunt competing platforms just like anybody else, no need to hide it
Are you kidding me?
It seems you strongly disagree with my impression. I don't want this to be a list war about posters, but a simple way to completely refute my point would be to provide a link to a similarly spiteful dig by Dave at the 3DS in a thread entirely unrelated to it. As I said, I don't remember anything like that, but I could well be wrong.This is some grade A bs lol.
And yet Nintendo obviously doesn't get half the furious shit thrown at it that Ubisoft did. People "understand" when its Nintendo playing business tactics.
I imagine Yakuza is born of Nintendo wanting Sega to toss them a Yakuza bone but Sega didn't want to dedicate the resources to porting the latter trilogy. So if Yakuza 1 + 2 HD sell amazingly (it won't), they will port the rest.
I imagine this is being done over Nagoshi's objections, if not without his knowledge. Yakuza always seemed like a personal thing to him and he's been steadfast that Sony helped him cultivate the series so Sony systems are where the series stays. I don't see Yakuza 6 being anywhere but PS4.
Did you not see Nagoshi in the japanese Nintendo Direct presenting all those Sega games?
I didn't mean currently, I meant the project was greenlit without consulting him. I apologize, my wording was bad.
Ah, ok. But I doubt he would be there presenting the games if that's what really happened.