farnham said:Nintendos Stronghold is THE WHOLE FRIGGIN WORLD...
Hey ! minus southern europe.
farnham said:Nintendos Stronghold is THE WHOLE FRIGGIN WORLD...
'Other' figures remind me of something.JoshuaJSlone said:NES
Japan: 19.35m
America: 34.00m
Other: 8.56m
SNES
Japan: 17.17m
America: 23.35m
Other: 8.58m
We don't make up things in this thread.Raist said:Hey ! minus southern europe.
Raist said:Hey ! minus southern europe.
what part exactly ?Cosmonaut X said:Please read the thread
*Guaraná said:no MC sales this week ?
It doesn't... but it's worth noting SEGA's direct response to Game Boy had "Kids" in it's branding. Pico's not the only games platform aimed at children... handhelds pre-DS/PSP were largely for kids as well.test_account said:If Game Gear was a kids system how does that changes anything about Pico?
And? PS2 wasn't aimed at the same demographic GB was either, I guess that also invalidates any comparison there?test_account said:What i mean is that GB is not aimed to kids like Pico was.
I understand what you're saying perfectly, I think we all do. Diversionary comparions aside, I don't think calling the PS3 "the biggest failure in gaming" is at all off base looking at where things sit today, where they look headed, and the dramatic scale of things. Sure, there's been platforms that sold worse or were dropped quicker, but not any platform in a similar position. PS3's going to be lucky if it cracks 30m lifetime the way things are going, which in itself may be a pretty respectable figure, but when you consider the positioning, support and branding this machine had... that's a pretty epic drop, far more dramatic than an experimental 3D "portable", kids edutainment toy or various MegaDrive hardware add-ons. making those sorts of flimsy comparisons doesn't put PS3 in a better light, it more reveals the massive scale of it's decline and the desperation of it's proponents.test_account said:The reason why i dont want to agrue anymore is because i see that you dont understand my points. You may think you understand them, but since i have to write much of the stuff over again it shows that you dont either havnt read my posts or that you dont understand what i mean, but since you quote what i say i guess you have read them. Maybe i'm not good enough to formulate my points, but unfortunately i dont think i can reformulate them any better so you will understand them.
And what you say in the end there makes me think that you havnt read all my posts (i wrote quite a few before you quoted me and you first quoted me on one of my first posts in this discussion). What i wrote in my previous post are things that i've already mentioned earlier in this thread. I wrote early on that i think its too early to call the PS3 the biggest failure in history and that i think the VB is one of the systems thats a bigger failure than the PS3 (VB's list of canceled games is about the same size (if not longer) than the list of released games and the system was discontunied the following year just to mention some factors). So this is not a "next breath proclaiming" as you claim. If you did read my previous posts i would found it wierd if you said something like that atleast.
If you dont agree with anything of what i say that is fine of course, but do you really think my comparisons are laughable? When i discuss things like this with people i dont call their agruments for laughable just because i dont agree with them. In cases like this i show people respect even if i dont agree with them, but maybe we are different. I also dont want to fight or become unfriendly with anyone just because we have different opinions.
I understand what you're saying perfectly, I think we all do. Diversionary comparions aside, I don't think calling the PS3 "the biggest failure in gaming"
The Dec NPD month is not even officially over. (it ends this saturday)perfectchaos007 said:I think its about time for a December NPD prediction thread *wink wink*
davepoobond said:PS3 is a far cry from being the worst failure in history. N64 was worse off imo, and that wasn't even that bad...
everything is just ballooned because games are of higher quality now. things happen faster.
Overall, N64 really only saw a dramatic decline from SFC in one core region... comparably, PS3's stumbling about everywhere compared to PS2. N64 still moved ~65% of what it's predecessor managed, PS3's going to lucky hit half that figure. Again, the drop from PS2 to PS3 in terms of Nintendo's mainline platforms would be like going directly from Famciom/NES to Gamecube in one cycle.davepoobond said:PS3 is a far cry from being the worst failure in history. N64 was worse off imo, and that wasn't even that bad...
jarrod said:Overall, N64 really only saw a dramatic decline from SFC in one core region... comparably, PS3's stumbling about everywhere compared to PS2. N64 still moved ~65% of what it's predecessor managed, PS3's going to lucky hit half that figure. Again, the drop from PS2 to PS3 in terms of Nintendo's mainline platforms would be like going directly from Famciom/NES to Gamecube in one cycle.
Nutter said:The Dec NPD month is not even officially over. (it ends this saturday)
reilo said:And hitting half of what PS2 sold is still twice that the N64 sold...
Actually, it would still be more than N64+GC combined, no?
davepoobond said:PS3 is a far cry from being the worst failure in history. N64 was worse off imo, and that wasn't even that bad...
everything is just ballooned because games are of higher quality now. things happen faster.
No, I meant half of 65%. Realistically, it'd take a miracle for PS3 to move 50% of what PS2 managed... it's not even possible at this point really.reilo said:And hitting half of what PS2 sold is still twice that the N64 sold...
Actually, it would still be more than N64+GC combined, no?
Which would be great if it was competing against those two platforms.reilo said:And hitting half of what PS2 sold is still twice that the N64 sold...
Actually, it would still be more than N64+GC combined, no?
davepoobond said:PS3 is a far cry from being the worst failure in history. N64 was worse off imo, and that wasn't even that bad...
5 wii titles, 4 DS and 1 PS2 in Top 10Moor-Angol said:Famitsu data for the week ending on december 23 (so i'm really in topic!!!)
2007/12/17 - 12/23
01. (DS / S-E) Final Fantasy IV - 308.794 / 308.794
02. (DS / Nintendo) Mario Party 8 - 307.901 / 1.070.481
03. (Wii / Nintendo) Wii Fit - 210.406 / 737.475
04. (Wii / Nintendo) Super Mario Galaxy - 109.029 / 680.165
05. (Wii / Nintendo) Wii Sports - 108.629 / 2.370.673
06. (DS / S-E) Dragon Quest IV - 108.352 / 962.776
07. (Wii / Nintendo) Wii Play - 104.635 / 1.918.814
08. (Wii / Nintendo) Mario & Sonic at Olympic Games - 100.433 / 307.198
09. (DS / BandaiNamco) Doraemon Baseball: Dramatic Stadium - 96.454 / 96.454
10. (PS2 / BandaiNamco) Naruto Shuuppuden: Narutimate Accel 2 - 94.330 / 94.330
11. (DS / Pokemon) Pokemon Mistery Dungeon Darkness/Time - 83.454 / 1.218.261
12. (DS / Level 5) Prof. Layton and the Devil's Box - 68.289 / 550.454
13. (Wii / Nintendo) Mario Party 8 - 60.320 / 1.007.899
14. (DS / Nintendo) Mario Kart DS - 53.158 / 2.660.373
15. (DS / Nintendo) Kousoku Card Battle: Card Hero - 49.163 / 49.163
16. (DS / Capcom) Mega Man Star Force 2: Berserk x Shinobi/Dinosaur - 47.056 / 203.285
17. (DS / Konami) Power Pro Pocket 10 - 46.891 / 128.832
18. (PS2 / Alchemist) Higurashi no Naku Koro ni Matsuri - 42.385 / 42.385
19. (PS2 / Konami) Winning Eleven 2008 - 39.041 / 518.742
20. (PS2 / Konami) Power Pro Baseball 14 Ketteiban - 37.480 / 37.480
Mario Party 8 and DS became million sellers in the same week, DQIV non game status is around the corner, WE 2008 (PS2) is over half million, not bad at all.
No PSP (as usual) and no PS3 games on top20, Sony should be worried... (ok, ok, PSP is considered as a multimedia device more than a game system for japanese people bla bla bla bla....)
Innotech said:http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=223946
Yes. that has to be it.
jett said:N64 games sold, though. Nintendo's especially. Sony am cry.
HK-47 said:PS3 hitting 60 million? Yeah thats likely >_>
jarrod said:Overall, N64 really only saw a dramatic decline from SFC in one core region... comparably, PS3's stumbling about everywhere compared to PS2. N64 still moved ~65% of what it's predecessor managed, PS3's going to lucky hit half that figure. Again, the drop from PS2 to PS3 in terms of Nintendo's mainline platforms would be like going directly from Famciom/NES to Gamecube in one cycle.
Actually RARE am cry, considering they made and self-published JFG. :loldavepoobond said:not Jet Force Gemini. NINTENDO AM CRYYYY
or Pokemon Snap
or Hey You Pikachu
They did back in 2004. Hell, people thought this machine was going to be the Nintendo-killer.davepoobond said:who knows though, did anyone ever think PSP would be selling as much as it is now?
Yeah, that'd fall under the "miracle" thing I mentioned earlier. :loldavepoobond said:perhaps PS3 is more akin to PS1 than the PS2? start out slow, end big. we know N64 and Gamecube weren't like that.
davepoobond said:PS3 is a far cry from being the worst failure in history. N64 was worse off imo, and that wasn't even that bad...
omg rite said:So if I said, "the sky is pink and clouds are made of maple candy.. imo", would it make it true?
jarrod said:Actually RARE am cry, considering they made and self-published JFG. :lol
Pokemon Snap was a huge seller too, moving nearly 4m units... in fact it's outsold every PS3 game so far released, outselling Motorstorm and Resistance combined even at this point. Actually, even Hey you Pikachu has outdone any lone PS3 game (selling almost 2m iirc). l
omg rite said:So if I said, "the sky is pink and clouds are made of maple candy.. imo", would it make it true?
reilo said:
Yes.
reilo said:Yes.
:lolreilo said:
Yes.
Sure, but 2-4m is pretty respectable no matter the platform really... espeically for genre divergent spinoffs.davepoobond said:while we're talking about comparability, maybe you should be comparing those releases to SNES games instead.
Son.Ralph.Funk said:How was the N64 a huge failure? It sold about 17 million less than the SNES. The PS3 will probably sell at least 50 million less than the PS2, and probably much more.
davepoobond said:if the PS3 ends up getting an install base that is XBOX+GC but its still less than Wii and 360...what does that make it?
reilo said:
Yes.
davepoobond said:if the PS3 ends up getting an install base that is XBOX+GC but its still less than Wii and 360...what does that make it?
Threi said:The loser of this generation?
antiloop said:Depends if you are in it for the statistics or the quality of the games.
well the wii already has the #2 highest ranked videogame ever in Super Mario Galaxy. Id say thats pretty good quality.antiloop said:Depends if you are in it for the statistics or the quality of the games. All consoles so far have had great games. At least the ones I have owned.
They are all winners.
schuelma said:Is this the Quality Games Create thread now?
Innotech said:well the wii already has the #2 highest ranked videogame ever in Super Mario Galaxy. Id say thats pretty good quality.
davepoobond said:N64 was worse off imo
omg rite said:So if I said, "the sky is pink and clouds are made of maple candy.. imo", would it make it true?
This comparison started with that you saying that GBA was more like the Pokémon Mini. I then said that Pokémon Mini was a system that was aimed at one specific group while VB (or GBA for that matter) wasnt in the same way. You also said it was "muddy" to call Pico a kids system, but every Pico game (atleast in the US) got a EC (early childhood) rating. But anyway, if you agree or not agree to what i say is up to you.jarrod said:It doesn't... but it's worth noting SEGA's direct response to Game Boy had "Kids" in it's branding. Pico's not the only games platform aimed at children... handhelds pre-DS/PSP were largely for kids as well.
And? PS2 wasn't aimed at the same demographic GB was either, I guess that also invalidates any comparison there?
Since you call my comparisons diversionary it shows that you didnt understand what i ment. I never tried to divert any of my points. All i did was to reply to your posts. I stand for everything i said in this discussion.jarrod said:I understand what you're saying perfectly, I think we all do. Diversionary comparions aside, I don't think calling the PS3 "the biggest failure in gaming" is at all off base looking at where things sit today, where they look headed, and the dramatic scale of things. Sure, there's been platforms that sold worse or were dropped quicker, but not any platform in a similar position. PS3's going to be lucky if it cracks 30m lifetime the way things are going, which in itself may be a pretty respectable figure, but when you consider the positioning, support and branding this machine had... that's a pretty epic drop, far more dramatic than an experimental 3D "portable", kids edutainment toy or various MegaDrive hardware add-ons. making those sorts of flimsy comparisons doesn't put PS3 in a better light, it more reveals the massive scale of it's decline and the desperation of it's proponents.
Wii-za said:So then I must said: It will be a success if the PS3 sells 10 million units in its lifetime..imo