how do you feel about the constant weird ass rolling
i can barely even remember doing that. i think i didn't have a problem with it. the only issue i really took with the controls was recentering the camera.
how do you feel about the constant weird ass rolling
Rhythm Thief is getting a really big push - most places have it displayed and out front which is fantastic.
Beyond the Labyrinth... not as such
i was due to get them today , then decided against, then found some cash in a pocket that i didn't know i had and decided to get them, then decided against it again! lol.
I might give it a week so i can clear a few things - as i hit Aki and other local spots pretty often, i might start collating the super-anecdotal view of what retail looks like once/twice a week (i do this informally on @dcharliejp anyways)
The problem with it is that it looks more like Space Harrier than Kid Icarus. They should've let Retro make a side scrolling Kid Icarus Returns instead.
The biggest problem with 3DS is that it's games has more in common with PSP games than DS games. They're 3D, often third person, racing, first person, etc, and very similar to regular console games. In other word, the 3DS is going after the same gamers as the Vita. How do you think that will go?
Sure, Nintendo games will probably keep on selling, and possibly all those games that sold well on the PSP too, like Monster Hunter for example, but I just don't see how the 3DS can keep selling more than the Vita once they both start getting the same games from the third party devs, which means that the 3DS will keep getting the inferior version.
and then when pit flies, you have to alternate between the 1 and 2 buttons to flap his wings.
and then when pit flies, you have to alternate between the 1 and 2 buttons to flap his wings.
If 3DS keeps selling 5-10x Vita on a weekly basis, why would 3rd-party devs bother porting their 3DS titles to Vita?
because they rove sony
Paper Mario (System Seller)
Kid Icarus (System Seller)
Luigi's Mansion (System Seller)
why would 3rd-party devs bother porting their 3DS titles to Vita?
Didn't you see how Rhythm Thief was selling, at least?
I understand; sometimes you just have to follow your heart.
The Wii sold more than the 360, yet it was the 360 that got the best versions. Developers like nice graphics. That's just the way it is. And we can already see console games ports on the 3DS. Next year (or this) we'll start seeing console games ported to Vita too, and the 3DS will get the inferior version.If 3DS keeps selling 5-10x Vita on a weekly basis, why would 3rd-party devs bother porting their 3DS titles to Vita?
If 3DS keeps selling 5-10x Vita on a weekly basis, why would 3rd-party devs bother porting their 3DS titles to Vita?
The Wii sold more than the 360, yet it was the 360 that got the best versions. Developers like nice graphics. That's just the way it is. And we can already see console games ports on the 3DS. Next year we'll start seeing console games ported to Vita too, and the 3DS will get the inferior version.
That's true even for Sony machines or Microsoft machines.as we've seen already - size of a Nintendo machines installed base doesn't guarantee you 3rd party sales.
The Wii sold more than the 360, yet it was the 360 that got the best versions. Developers like nice graphics. That's just the way it is. And we can already see console games ports on the 3DS. Next year (or this) we'll start seeing console games ported to Vita too, and the 3DS will get the inferior version.
these are expected to be System Sellers?
I am asking with my serious face on, i wouldn't have put any of them in that bracket
Hmm, I was expecting Sales-Age to experience a bit of a decline. The 3DS/Vita battle isn't particularly competitive, and we're a long way away from the next head-to-head hardware battle unless PS4 appears out of nowhere.
I've said elsewhere: I *could* see Luigi's Mansion taking off unexpectedly. It's got a lot of things going for it, potentially, and could well fit naturally on a handheld. I wouldn't write it off.Don't make me laugh with the bolded. 3DS may get a bump with their release, but those are not system sellers.
They won't bet against Nintendo, they'll just port their big franchises to both the Vita and the 3DS and it's only natural that the Vita will get the better version in that case. The only scenario where that wouldn't happen is if the developers make really good use of the pen.This isn't a home console, these are handhelds were Nintendo is the undisputed king. Any 3rd party dev that bets against a Nintendo handheld is plain crazy.
They won't bet against Nintendo, they'll just port their big franchises to both the Vita and the 3DS and it's only natural that the Vita will get the better version in that case. The only scenario where that wouldn't happen is if the developers make really good use of the pen.
In my opinion this is a huge problem with the 3DS. If you're looking at the current games library the 3DS has basically become a PSP with dual screens. Is that really what former DS owners wants?
They won't bet against Nintendo, they'll just port their big franchises to both the Vita and the 3DS and it's only natural that the Vita will get the better version in that case. The only scenario where that wouldn't happen is if the developers make really good use of the pen.
In my opinion this is a huge problem with the 3DS. If you're looking at the current games library the 3DS has basically become a PSP with dual screens. Is that really what former DS owners wants?
these are expected to be System Sellers?
I am asking with my serious face on, i wouldn't have put any of them in that bracket.
I'm not sure they're supposed to be system sellers, I'm sure they're supposed to be the solid second tier of stuff that makes people who were otherwise looking to buy the system finally pull the trigger, or at the very least keeps the 3DS relevant (in-store displays, for example, contribute a lot to continued awareness/interest issue).
So yeah I don't necessarily agree with ugoo18's characterization, but I don't see any reality where the 3DS doesn't have a pretty great year on the backs of the aggregate software strength even though I can't point to specific pieces of software that have multi-million potential.
They won't bet against Nintendo, they'll just port their big franchises to both the Vita and the 3DS and it's only natural that the Vita will get the better version in that case. The only scenario where that wouldn't happen is if the developers make really good use of the pen.
In my opinion this is a huge problem with the 3DS. If you're looking at the current games library the 3DS has basically become a PSP with dual screens. Is that really what former DS owners wants?
So yeah I don't necessarily agree with ugoo18's characterization, but I don't see any reality where the 3DS doesn't have a pretty great year on the backs of the aggregate software strength even though I can't point to specific pieces of software that have multi-million potential.
Tomadachi should have that potential, shouldn't it?
They won't bet against Nintendo, they'll just port their big franchises to both the Vita and the 3DS and it's only natural that the Vita will get the better version in that case.
They do but publishers impose where software should go.The Wii sold more than the 360, yet it was the 360 that got the best versions. Developers like nice graphics. That's just the way it is. And we can already see console games ports on the 3DS. Next year (or this) we'll start seeing console games ported to Vita too, and the 3DS will get the inferior version.
But is it really catering to the DS demographic?Why can't the 3DS be both. Heck, one of the main arguments being presented is that with the current and upcoming software lineup the 3DS would be catering to both the DS AND PSP markets simultaneously.
I'm not sure they're supposed to be system sellers, I'm sure they're supposed to be the solid second tier of stuff that makes people who were otherwise looking to buy the system finally pull the trigger, or at the very least keeps the 3DS relevant (in-store displays, for example, contribute a lot to continued awareness/interest issue).
So yeah I don't necessarily agree with ugoo18's characterization, but I don't see any reality where the 3DS doesn't have a pretty great year on the backs of the aggregate software strength even though I can't point to specific pieces of software that have multi-million potential.
But is it really catering to the DS demographic?
DS for me is pen control, top down or isometric view RPGs, puzzle and adventure point and click games. Personally I'm having trouble finding those type of games on the 3DS, it might get better in the future though but right now I have bought 17 DS games and 5 3DS for my 3DS. It's still pretty awesome that you can run DS games on it though, that is a system seller feature imo since the DS library is so huge
these are expected to be System Sellers?
I am asking with my serious face on, i wouldn't have put any of them in that bracket.
as we've seen already - size of a Nintendo machines installed base doesn't guarantee you 3rd party sales.
Seriously - everyone i saw today was buying Monster Hunter. No joke
It's the Wii/PS3 gap. More or less. It won't matter in gameplay but it will definitely matter when they're trying to sell the game by showing trailers and screenshots.I think all the Vita has here is better graphics, but that doesn't mean too much anymore. This isn't the DS/PSP gap.
It's the Wii/PS3 gap. More or less. It won't matter in gameplay but it will definitely matter when they're trying to sell the game by showing trailers and screenshots.
It's the Wii/PS3 gap. More or less. It won't matter in gameplay but it will definitely matter when they're trying to sell the game by showing trailers and screenshots.
1. No, it's really not. It's quite a bit less than the Wii/PS3 gap.
2. What handheld game has ever been sold solely off graphics?
It's the Wii/PS3 gap. More or less. It won't matter in gameplay but it will definitely matter when they're trying to sell the game by showing trailers and screenshots.
Well, I suppose a logo is a graphic.
Touche.
When the screen of the device you are playing is from 2 to 5 inches, few screenshots don't really do shit in either way. The home console comparison is really bad when we are talking about handhelds.It's the Wii/PS3 gap. More or less. It won't matter in gameplay but it will definitely matter when they're trying to sell the game by showing trailers and screenshots.
So what kind of gap is it then?1. No, it's really not. It's quite a bit less than the Wii/PS3 gap.
2. What handheld game has ever been sold solely off graphics?
So what kind of gap is it then?
Resident Evil Revelations looks amazing, possibly the best looking 3DS game shown so far, but from what I've seen it's still not even close to matching Uncharted on Vita.
But yeah, no game sell solely on graphics, it doesn't exactly hurt if it looks great though, especially if pics gets posted on boards.
This is a tiny niche part of the video game buying public. Being popular on the boards has never mattered.especially if pics gets posted on boards.
I was here, and yes the PSP got stomped by the DS even though it had better graphics, definitely. But PSP also had other issues and it got typical console games while the DS got handheld games, the latter being the choice of the masses. Based on the current and upcoming 3DS and Vita library I'm not sure that we will see that kind of gameplay difference between the two this time around. You don't think graphics will matter at all if they both get the same type of games?Where were you when PSP and DS launched? Look how PSP stomped DS with its PS2-like graphics... Yeah.
So what kind of gap is it then?
Resident Evil Revelations looks amazing, possibly the best looking 3DS game shown so far, but from what I've seen it's still not even close to matching Uncharted on Vita.
Its own kind.
The 3DS can output much better looking games than the Wii.
The Vita can't output as good of looking games as the PS3.
I was here, and yes the PSP got stomped by the DS even though it had better graphics, definitely. But PSP also had other issues and it got typical console games while the DS got handheld games, the latter being the choice of the masses. Based on the current and upcoming 3DS and Vita library I'm not sure that we will see that kind of gameplay difference between the two this time around. You don't think graphics will matter at all if they both get the same type of games?
No. 3DS will have Nintendo games that don't rely on visual output.I was here, and yes the PSP got stomped by the DS even though it had better graphics, definitely. But PSP also had other issues and it got typical console games while the DS got handheld games, the latter being the choice of the masses. Based on the current and upcoming 3DS and Vita library I'm not sure that we will see that kind of gameplay difference between the two this time around. You don't think graphics will matter at all if they both get the same type of games?
Its own kind.
The 3DS can output much better looking games than the Wii.
The Vita can't output as good of looking games as the PS3.
No. 3DS will have Nintendo games that don't rely on visual output.