By that logic we should’ve seen Forza, Halo Infinite, HiFi Rush etc. on Ps5 by now.MS platforms are just not sustainable enough to pass on other platforms especially the most popular of all : the PlayStation.
Yes you can do third person over the shoulder in Starfield.Sony has the studios and personal to do a better game, but they wont.
and No, Starfield ll not come to PS
Are these studios in room with us?Sony has the studios and personal to do a better game, but they wont.
and No, Starfield ll not come to PS
Long game ain't really working.I don't think it will ever come to Playstation, unless MS business plan changes dramatically.
If they release it they are devaluing their own platform. They will get some good money from sales sure, but MS is playing the long game. They are spending billions to put Sony out of business, so i don't see them releasing Starfield or any other Bethesda title on PS.
It's not a MS studio game, though. Bethesda has a long history of multiplatform games that were always on Sony consoles too, and this is the first time when it wasn't. I can see this being more of a timed exclusive that will eventually come to PS5. They're simply in a position now where they don't have to make such promises.There's really 3 pages of discussion asking if an MS, singleplayer first party game is going to be released on a competing platform?
It's not a MS studio game, though. Bethesda has a long history of multiplatform games that were always on Sony consoles too, and this is the first time when it wasn't. I can see this being more of a timed exclusive that will eventually come to PS5. They're simply in a position now where they don't have to make such promises.
Such a shame; imagine how much better it'd run and look.Two very completely different games with two very different gameplay loops. But of course this is probably just bait.
Oh, I see. This isn't a serious thread.
They can keep Redfall, but Starfield and Hifi Rush would be nice to have; and yes, I do know that this will never happen.No thanks, we don’t want Starfield nor do we want Redfall.
ZeniMax is 100% owned by Microsoft and MS has already cancelled the PS5 versions of games that were in development when the purchase happened.It's not a MS studio game, though. Bethesda has a long history of multiplatform games that were always on Sony consoles too, and this is the first time when it wasn't. I can see this being more of a timed exclusive that will eventually come to PS5. They're simply in a position now where they don't have to make such promises.
Yup, if they were going to there’s no way they wouldn’t have done it at launch to maximise sales.If it hasn't happened, it's not going to.
Microsoft looked at the projected Playstation sales and said "nah, fuck it". They're not going back now.
Oh, I see. This isn't a serious thread.
In that case don't mind me, carry on with your retard man child console tribalism, then.
Yeah but it's a bit of a different situation from stuff like Halo or Gears. These were the franchises that were always associated with Xbox and never saw the release on any of the competing platforms. Expecting Halo to come out on PS would be like expecting Zelda to come out on PC. Bethesda, on the other hand, was just poached by MS and like I said, it has a long history of multiplatform games so they have to at least take customer expectations into consideration. It's also the reason why it wouldn't be a brand issue because while releasing something like Halo on competing platform would kinda be seen as diminishing for the Xbox as a console platform, Bethesda doesn't have that kind of brand association. It would only benefit them to make this a timed exclusive because no brand association equals no risk of diminishing your brand, and second release equals more sales.ZeniMax is 100% owned by Microsoft and MS has already cancelled the PS5 versions of games that were in development when the purchase happened.
I think their intention is very clear regarding exclusivity.
I would honestly not be surprised if it was at a moment discussed in some meetings.By that logic we should’ve seen Forza, Halo Infinite, HiFi Rush etc. on Ps5 by now.
I disagree that it wouldn’t be a brand issue to port Starfield to PS5. You already have every idiot in the world pushing the narrative that this is the last chance for Xbox, the only option to get rid of the first party curse and other nonsense.It's also the reason why it wouldn't be a brand issue because while releasing something like Halo on competing platform would kinda be seen as diminishing for the Xbox as a console platform, Bethesda doesn't have that kind of brand association. It would only benefit them to make this a timed exclusive because no brand association equals no risk of diminishing your brand, and second release equals more sales.
Could be. I dunno, time will tell. I don't care either way since I'm already playing it on PC but I feel kinda bad for those who are gonna miss out on a great game.I disagree that it wouldn’t be a brand issue to port Starfield to PS5. You already have every idiot in the world pushing the narrative that this is the last chance for Xbox, the only option to get rid of the first party curse and other nonsense.
Porting Starfield would be a PR disaster and for what? It’s actually the first party game the most likely to be profitable for MS as it is, considering the PC market.
Never gonna happen imo.
We'll se by the end of this decade if it's working. They only just started.Long game ain't really working.
It's not a MS studio game, though. Bethesda has a long history of multiplatform games that were always on Sony consoles too, and this is the first time when it wasn't. I can see this being more of a timed exclusive that will eventually come to PS5. They're simply in a position now where they don't have to make such promises.
Starfield was initial develop with the PlayStation as a platform before MS brought Activision and canceling the PS5 version.
How ignorant is that? MS bought Bethesda, they are trying to buy Activision. Also talking about cancelling a console version of a game years before release is bonkers. Nothing at that stage is very console specific. It is more like canceling plans to optimize for PS5, not canceling a tangible PS5 version.Starfield was initial develop with the PlayStation as a platform before MS brought Activision and canceling the PS5 version.
I guess I will wait spiderman 1, miles and spiderman 2 on Xbox release then.Might happen in 1 lol
I guess some people are still in denial.It's not a MS studio game, though. Bethesda has a long history of multiplatform games that were always on Sony consoles too, and this is the first time when it wasn't. I can see this being more of a timed exclusive that will eventually come to PS5. They're simply in a position now where they don't have to make such promises.
I was expecting that too, but it really depends on how well it is received by players. It has reviewed well, but not as a must play. If it was legitimately a must play game like Skyrim, then a PS5 port would be a big deal and sell well, if it is good, maybe almost great, but not amazing, then maybe there is more value in keeping it exclusive. Of course I have yet to play it because I will not pay a ransom to play a week early and will not commit to DLC without trying the main game. Maybe it will be better than Skyrim to me. Or maybe the delay is determined by how well it does. 5 years is PS6 / Arguing about when Nintendo will release Switch 3 time frame. 2 years is this gen.I personally think it will...eventually. When Starfield becomes total shovelware like Skyrim is now (you can play it on 50 different devices/appliances). My guess is between 2-5 years when all the hype dies down it will be announced for multiple platforms, not just Sony. Basically a GOTY Edition so they can soak up all the remaining cash.
Bow to your master.All hail almighty Solidus12, who speaks for all PlayStation players. Tell us what to do next! We await further instructions.