KAL2006 said:shouldn't it be time for Uncharted 3 OT soon
jling84 said:Er... is Playmania legit? I've never heard of them.
Same deal as R3 not surprising ta all really, different reviewers.Pranay_ said:Its wierd, that in the magazine they say unchared 3 is the best game in the series and end up giving 94 LOL.
Can be mp issues hmm
Pranay_ said:Its wierd, that in the magazine they say unchared 3 is the best game in the series and end up giving 94 LOL.
Can be mp issues hmm
Robinspain said:"La mejor aventura de la historia"
thuway said:I garuntee you, I'll have the game before most of you. People here don't give a fuck about street dates.
Great news for us, as 1st november is a bank holiday in France Sony allowed retailers to sell the game on 28th Octobre (awesome 3 days week-end incoming)!!!marc^o^ said:October 28th in France
Busty said:Oh GAF. Don't ever change.
They gave Uncharted 2 100? And said Uncharted 3 was better and gave it 94? What is this madness.nib95 said:Weirder still is that they gave the last 100. Curious indeed.
Pazuzu9 said:They gave Uncharted 2 100? And said Uncharted 3 was better and gave it 94? What is this madness.
thuway said:I garuntee you, I'll have the game before most of you. People here don't give a fuck about street dates.
Busty said:I DEMAND that this be a box quote.
Pazuzu9 said:They gave Uncharted 2 100? And said Uncharted 3 was better and gave it 94? What is this madness.
But... Uncharted 2 is better than Gears 3. ¬_¬Carbonox_Ratchet said:Prepare for a lot of that.
I reckon it's more or less down to the fact that back when Uncharted 2 came out, it was a 100/100 game to them because it really went above and beyond anything else, including Uncharted 1.
Now, Uncharted 3 might be an improved game over Uncharted 2 but it may not necessarily still be above and beyond anything else in this current time period.
This is the only way that makes sense to me.
I think it's the only way to think about, in general.Carbonox_Ratchet said:Prepare for a lot of that.
I reckon it's more or less down to the fact that back when Uncharted 2 came out, it was a 100/100 game to them because it really went above and beyond anything else, including Uncharted 1.
Now, Uncharted 3 might be an improved game over Uncharted 2 but it may not necessarily still be above and beyond anything else in this current time period.
This is the only way that makes sense to me.
Represent. said:Where the fuck are the other "western" reviews. Didnt this embargo lift on the 15th.
I haven't played Gears 3 yet but is that true to you?Pazuzu9 said:But... Uncharted 2 is better than Gears 3. ¬_¬
Pazuzu9 said:They gave Uncharted 2 100? And said Uncharted 3 was better and gave it 94? What is this madness.
Pazuzu9 said:But... Uncharted 2 is better than Gears 3. ¬_¬
madmaxx350 said:I haven't played Gears 3 yet but is that true to you?
I played Gears 2 and I would take U2 over it anyday but I don't know about Gears 3.
rhino4evr said:I'm not sure what the popular opinion is on Gears 3 is, but I was pretty disappointed with the single player campaign. A friend of mine who is a SUPER fan (as in bought the New Gears Xbox AND the Legendary Edition) is disappointed as well.
I still think Uncharted 2 is the best game of the current generation of consoles. If part 3 is equally as good ill be more then happy
Second said:Only a 9.9 ?!
I am dizzy I seen this so many times in so many Uncharted topics now.I knwo you are joking but its funny to seeweekend_warrior said:pre-order cancelled.
LittleBigPlanet was way better than LBP2! The story mode in LBP1 had so much more charm.kneePat said:This happens alot... recent examples: Gears of War 3, Resistance 3, Forza 4, inFamous 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, also countless sports games.
Moral of the story is to not care so much about the metascore but the actual words / opinions in the review. Also I think when they say a game is better or the best in the series that doesn't have to be reflected in the score, and all games should be scored individually.
First of all, they're very different games just in breed. I think you might just be kidding, but if you're not, UC3 might be better than UC2 which might be better than Gears 3 and that's a perfectly fine opinion. But you should know its possible that someone's opinion may be different than yours as well as the fact that the just because the scores awarded to the games don't line up with UC3>UC2>Gears 3 their opinion may be still be same yours.
kneePat said:This happens alot... recent examples: Gears of War 3, Resistance 3, Forza 4, inFamous 2, LittleBigPlanet 2, also countless sports games.
Moral of the story is to not care so much about the metascore but the actual words / opinions in the review. Also I think when they say a game is better or the best in the series that doesn't have to be reflected in the score, and all games should be scored individually.
Spy said:LittleBigPlanet was way better than LBP2! The story mode in LBP1 had so much more charm.
I'm going to the U3 movie theater event tomorrow, and chances are I'll have it even before you, lol. Anyone here go to one yesterday?thuway said:I garuntee you, I'll have the game before most of you. People here don't give a fuck about street dates.
Only a 9.9 ?!
kneePat said:My point was that reviewers say that a sequel like LBP2 is the better game and give it lower a score than its predecessor all the time because the score isn't the metric by which you compare the games, but the words in the review do an ample job of comparing the games for you, usually.
laika09 said:If the score isn't the metric by which you compare games, then what the hell is it?
hey_it's_that_dog said:The score is one metric you can use, but keep in mind that games keep getting better and the scale doesn't increase. So a game from 2009 that was a 9/10 might not be as good as a game in 2011 that is also a 9/10.
Reviewers can't give a lower score to a game in the present just because they know that eventually they'll like something better. They have to give high scores, then be faced with the problem that the scale has a maximum that they cannot exceed, even if a future game is better than anything they've played before.
So when comparing games across significant spans time, the number alone isn't going to work very well.
laika09 said:This case isn't comparing Uncharted 3 to Super Mario Brothers, though. It's saying that a new game, coming out 2 years after its prequel, on the same hardware, that outdoes its predecessor in every possible way, and is reviewed by the exact same person, is empirically (and mathematically) 6% worse. What meaning does your review score even hold at that point? Do we need to calculate 5% score deflation every year or something?
SolidSnakex said:Sony Japan got Harrison Ford to play Uncharted 3 for the Japanese marketing commercial
http://andriasang.com/comyni/
Dude, its INDIANA JONES PLAYING UNCHARTED. Wtf!Kazerei said:Foreign celebrity advertising :lol
NeoUltima said:He's probably like "damn, Indy don't got shit on Drake".
it's the new memePazuzu9 said:They gave Uncharted 2 100? And said Uncharted 3 was better and gave it 94? What is this madness.
nib95 said:Weirder still is that they gave the last 100. Curious indeed.
shidoshi said:The world when Uncharted 2 may have received a 100 and the world when Uncharted 3 may receive a 94 aren't the same worlds.
What's different now? What game in U2's genre has come along that has raised the bar further? It still stands up 2 years later imo, and I just don't agree with scoring U3 lower just because it's new; if it's better, then it's score should reflect that. If Batman AC can get 10'smadmaxx350 said:so true,if I had to review U2 this year, I wouldn't give it a 100 whereas I probably would 2 years ago. OOT Master Quest is still is a 100 for me though
madmaxx350 said:so true,if I had to review U2 this year, I wouldn't give it a 100 whereas I probably would 2 years ago. OOT Master Quest is still is a 100 for me though