Galvanise_ said:.
I'm clearly joking.
Though I think 2 years apart is enough time.
there are people who really feel that way, though.
Galvanise_ said:.
I'm clearly joking.
Though I think 2 years apart is enough time.
Massa said:I think Golden Shower will get slaughtered in the reviews.
It's not only coming soon after another Uncharted game, it's coming soon after Uncharted 3.
Exactly man, and please come back next year to share your impressions.vulva said:I was kind of on the fence, but seeing that it's looking to be a mediocre release, I'll save my money until the inevitable 20 dollar price drop.
you were afraid that uncharted 3 would be like uncharted 2 and tightly linear?Crunched said:Eurogamer's review pretty much confirmed what I was afraid of. I guess that's what I get after being so excited by GT's take.
Oh well.
Crunched said:Eurogamer's review pretty much confirmed what I was afraid of. I guess that's what I get after being so excited by GT's take.
Oh well.
dark10x said:I'm going to have to agree here. At leas 50% of the review is spent harping on the fact that you are offered little in the way of choice. This has always been the case for the series and it was their goal to begin with. Uncharted is not an open ended game and has never aspired to become one.
Uncharted 2 flawlessly executed what it set out to do and I expect the same of UC3. There are plenty of moments where you are driven forward, but that doesn't mean some of the combat and stealth sequences can't offer some additional freedom. It seems to me that the reviewer simply wants to be able to run off the beaten path and I'm left wondering WHY exactly.
There was a time when it wasn't possible to deliver games which allowed such freedom, but now they have become commonplace. In the end, I find that the experiences that attempt to offer complete freedom of movement wind up becoming very shallow in the end. Sure, I can climb all of those fences and scale any wall, but what one finds on the other side of that wall looks exactly like where I just came from. Nearly every sandbox game this generation has given me that same feeling. Freedom sounds great on paper, but it does not necessarily lead to a compelling experience.
The type of roller coaster ride Uncharted offers isn't even all that common. It's not Call of Duty in the sense that you are performing the same actions over and over again. They mix up shooting, climbing, light platforming, simple puzzles, slower paced sections, and great scripting into one game and delivers all of them at the highest quality.
It simply feels as if they wanted the game to be something that it was never designed to be.
I dunno, Ghost of Sparta did pretty good and it was released soon after God O War 3 right? Golden Abyss just needs to be a bit longer to justify the price or have some extra modes.Massa said:I think Golden Shower will get slaughtered in the reviews.
It's not only coming soon after another Uncharted game, it's coming soon after Uncharted 3.
modern borefare 4 shoSolidSnakex said:Will any of the remaining "big" end of the year games disappoint? Batman, U3 and BF3 have all received glowing reviews.
That's the part when people post threads like "nfs shift 2 is a better game than uc3. Discuss. "Chinner said:im really looking forward to the part where we all play uncharted 3 ourselves and forget about all the reviews and decide our own opinions. thats probably the best part.
Seems moved more in the direction of movie game. "Stray from the path and instantly die." Not what I was hoping for.Y2Kev said:you were afraid that uncharted 3 would be like uncharted 2 and tightly linear?
I think if the text in the review is all accurate, that 8 is well deserved.Deadly Cyclone said:Care to elaborate? One 8 is disappointing you?
EDIT: I really cannot tell who is serious anymore.
eurogamer give pretty much everything a 8.0Second said:Eurogamer also gave Gears 3 an 8.
They don't seem to be fans on the number 3.
oh shiiiifunkystudent said:eurogamer give pretty much everything a 8.0
well unless its made in the UK or something. but there go to score for most games seems to be a 8
Y2Kev said:modern borefare 4 sho
I suspect Assassin's Creed will review well enough, but I can't deny that the idea of yet ANOTHER installment set within the same world is leaving me cold. Brotherhood was already a bit of a stretch yet they managed to deliver in the end. I'm not sure I can take another one until they decide to push forward to another time frame.SolidSnakex said:Will any of the remaining "big" end of the year games disappoint? Batman, U3 and BF3 have all received glowing reviews.
plagiarize said:more and more you are becoming one of my favourite posters.
even though your avatar is a duck.
From now on i shall call them 3urogam3rSecond said:Eurogamer also gave Gears 3 an 8.
They don't seem to be fans on the number 3.
Second said:Eurogamer also gave Gears 3 an 8.
MW3 will probably meet its middling expectations. Skyrim is the only wildcard, but so far every preview has been very enthusiastic.SolidSnakex said:Will any of the remaining "big" end of the year games disappoint? Batman, U3 and BF3 have all received glowing reviews.
Crunched said:Seems moved more in the direction of movie game. "Stray from the path and instantly die." Not what I was hoping for.
There's a place for it, and I love the UC series for what it does, but I was hoping for more freedom.
Gravijah said:you haven't even played it you are so bias
Deadly Cyclone said:I will laugh (and re-quote this post) when Eurogamer gives Skyrim a 8/10 stating there was "too much to do and it was too big."
Haven't read anything about 3D so far and I'm dying to know how it runs as well.SecretOfEvermore said:I've not read any review.
Has any reviewer commented on the 3D-effect of the game?
I don't know if I'd call less linear paths a "total change." I wanted the emphasis here to be more on the game part, not the spectacle.Y2Kev said:I don't see how you could love something for what it is but then want it to totally change.
zoukka said:How dare they use anything but 10 to describe the great production values these games offer? What do they think they are, critics, journalists... people with opinions?!
Not unless the same dude is reviewing it. He favors open world shit and "freedom" in games it seems.Deadly Cyclone said:I will laugh (and re-quote this post) when Eurogamer gives Skyrim a 8/10 stating there was "too much to do and it was too big."
SecretOfEvermore said:I've not read any review.
Has any reviewer commented on the 3D-effect of the game?
Crunched said:Seems moved more in the direction of movie game. "Stray from the path and instantly die." Not what I was hoping for.
There's a place for it, and I love the UC series for what it does, but I was hoping for more freedom.
I think if the text in the review is all accurate, that 8 is well deserved.
dark10x said:I'm going to have to agree here. At least 50% of the review is spent harping on the fact that you are offered little in the way of choice. This has always been the case for the series and it was their goal to begin with. Uncharted is not an open ended game and has never aspired to become one.
Uncharted 2 flawlessly executed what it set out to do and I expect the same of UC3. There are plenty of moments where you are driven forward, but that doesn't mean some of the combat and stealth sequences can't offer some additional freedom. It seems to me that the reviewer simply wants to be able to run off the beaten path and I'm left wondering WHY exactly.
There was a time when it wasn't possible to deliver games which allowed such freedom, but now they have become commonplace. In the end, I find that the experiences that attempt to offer complete freedom of movement wind up becoming very shallow in the end. Sure, I can climb all of those fences and scale any wall, but what one finds on the other side of that wall looks exactly like where I just came from. Nearly every sandbox game this generation has given me that same feeling. Freedom sounds great on paper, but it does not necessarily lead to a compelling experience.
The type of roller coaster ride Uncharted offers isn't even all that common. It's not Call of Duty in the sense that you are performing the same actions over and over again. They mix up shooting, climbing, light platforming, simple puzzles, slower paced sections, and great scripting into one game and delivers all of them at the highest quality.
It simply feels as if they wanted the game to be something that it was never designed to be.
Wow, where did you hear that Parkin was reviewing Skyrim? Can't wait to read it.Deadly Cyclone said:I will laugh (and re-quote this post) when Eurogamer gives Skyrim a 8/10 stating there was "too much to do and it was too big."
dark10x said:I suspect Assassin's Creed will review well enough, but I can't deny that the idea of yet ANOTHER installment set within the same world is leaving me cold. Brotherhood was already a bit of a stretch yet they managed to deliver in the end. I'm not sure I can take another one until they decide to push forward to another time frame.
Did you read the review, or have you played the game?cjtiger300 said:I don't get this, there are areas to explore. Hunting for treasures is a perfect way to somewhat deviate from the "path". And if you are complaining about the cinematic parts, of course you should die if you don't get out of a collapsing building! "oh, this building is falling down, but I want to see whats behind this desk......WTF, I'm dead!!!!! 8/10!!!!!!!"
nib95 said:The flaw here is that you think all opinions are equal or in themselves get a pass from critsism simply because they are just that, someone else's opinion. They don't. And in this instance the journalist in question from Eurogamer has a very peculiar one. Not the score. Ignore the score. But the actual criticisms made. Which I and a few others (dark10x's post is noteworthy) have already responded to.
Crunched said:Seems moved more in the direction of movie game. "Stray from the path and instantly die." Not what I was hoping for.
There's a place for it, and I love the UC series for what it does, but I was hoping for more freedom.
I think if the text in the review is all accurate, that 8 is well deserved.
Crunched said:Seems moved more in the direction of movie game. "Stray from the path and instantly die." Not what I was hoping for.
There's a place for it, and I love the UC series for what it does, but I was hoping for more freedom.
I think if the text in the review is all accurate, that 8 is well deserved.
probably not going to hear much on this until the inevitable DF article on the matter. i trust in Naughty Dog though.SecretOfEvermore said:I've not read any review.
Has any reviewer commented on the 3D-effect of the game?
nib95 said:Few problems with this. First is that you insinuate linearity as automatically 'negative'. This is something I personally see an issue with. A game's quality shouldn't be judged on it's genre or style of gameplay alone, be it open world or linear. Rather it's the implementation of whatever method or medium it chooses that determines this.
You have design constructs in both linear and open world games, and not all games following either or do so successfully.
Y2Kev said:you calling me bias means you are bias i mean stop being bais
J-Rzez said:This, came to question this. Any review go into depth on the 3D in this game? I can't read through all the reviews right now.
marc^o^ said:Haven't read anything about 3D so far and I'm dying to know how it runs as well.
Not too in-depht but that was a quote from an early review from playmania saying that "The 3D effect is very successful, one of the best theyve seen".SecretOfEvermore said:Has any reviewer commented on the 3D-effect of the game?