End of the day, there's always jobs. In fact, there's so many jobs unemployment rates are still at historic lows (aside from covid years which were often mandated shut downs). So the jobs are there.
Comes down to if someone is good enough to hold onto a job and if someone can adjust and get a different one if they are cut.
Unless a company is going bankrupt and everyone gets canned, what do most companies do when they do mass layoffs the past bunch of years? 5% or 10% of people tops? So despite all the years of tech and AI killing jobs (where's all the AI trucks taking over shipping?) a typical company still keeps 90%+ of people. And that assumes the company cuts people. My company has been growing steady in sales and employees for over 10 years since I joined.
So dont fall for all the articles about job losses only. There's never articles about hiring (except Amazon and WM promoting holiday temp worker increases). If you truly only believed in losses only, every company would be insanely down workers and unemployment rates would be 80%.
Maybe all the digital deskjobbers who might be canned die to ChatGPT or whatever taking your job should get a bit more old school and work for a company that makes bread or cans of soup. You still need people to do physical parts of a job and even the desk job tasks can only be automated so much. Companies still need brain power to think of ideas, negotiate deals, agree on strategies etc....
It sounds like the digital jobbers getting phased out are Phase 2 of paper pushers losing jobs to automated invoicing and reports the past 30-40 years. A machine could do it way faster and more accurately (assuming things are set up perfectly). To keep a paper pushing kind of role, you got to adjust to the tech and be someone who can take that data and improve on it (ie. fix mistakes or use your head to do wonders with it a numbnut program like SAP can just spit out data).