Senua
Member
2x in 1080p mode and 4x in 720pcyberheater said:Still looks too good to be true. Does the actual game have any AA?
2x in 1080p mode and 4x in 720pcyberheater said:Still looks too good to be true. Does the actual game have any AA?
cyberheater said:No doubt. The PS3 is a lovely gaming machine and it's the first machine I recommend to my friends if they ask weather they should get a PS3 or a 360.
I hope you're not taking this thread too seriously?
skybaby said:You don't have to go back that far. We're seeing it right now!
Pre-damage: damage sucks, it's about pristine car porn!
Post-damage: take that forza, our damage is much better haha!
Class_A_Ninja said:Xbox 360s die a lot.
jakonovski said:PD simply doesn't have a history of knowing how to make good physics. Like a lot of Japanese devs, they're stuck in their rut (amazing car graphics in this case). I'll believe good physics in GT5 when I see it, and I'll be playing myself when it comes out, because I love the career mode. Until that I'll stick with the 360 because there's no sense in buying a second console until the god game you want comes out.
Iknos said:Eh...go easy on them.
It's been really rough for these guys. Not only is their favorite console in 3rd place...but they are getting shafted with inferior looking versions of multiplatform games.
GuessWho said:Graphics: GT5 > Forza 3
Everything Else: Forza 3 > GT5
Winner Forza 3. It's so simple.
It's always the same. Forza has online play, GT4 doesn't! Kaz won't do it if it's not perfect, online gaming is in it's infancy! The list goes on, next up are: liveries :lolD'ultimate said:So I'm not the only one who sees this. Its just months ago the GT camp was all "damage suxxors". Now they're all fapping to it.
D'ultimate said:So I'm not the only one who sees this. Its just months ago the GT camp was all "damage suxxors". Now they're all fapping to it.
I'm not saying you're definitely wrong (F3 might be a better game, sim-wise than GT5, don't know). But even so, since PD is currently still working on GT5 and they especially said they want to upgrade the physics engine, what you said recommends you as a troll. No offense really (and you may actually not be a troll.. i don't really care), but even the way you worded it is against you..you over-praise Forza to the point of being too realistic? I'm pretty sure there are PC sims that offer at least the same degree of simulation realism. You also talk as if PD can never make GT a sim as good as Forza.. This: "But GT fans are only fooling themselves if they think PD can out-do Turn 10 in the sim area of racing." makes it look like GT is an arcade racer compared to Forza, and every car controls and behaves the same(which is not the case in GT games prior to GT5)...simulation is not only physics and customization you know.F#A#Oo said:I own all the console's and my post reflected this. I will be buying GT5 AND Forza.
Having owned and completed GT5 I can safely say PD are masters at making cars look awesome and detailed. But gameplay wise the Forza demo showed off Turn 10 have the simulation aspects down to a T. To th point it might be too realistic.
But whatever man...I'm not interested in this GT5 vs Forza...I will enjoy both. But GT fans are only fooling themselves if they think PD can out-do Turn 10 in the sim area of racing.
adelante said:See that's the thing! You'd think that having to go through multiple RROD experiences would've have traumatized 360 owners and make them more rabid posters but as it turned out, it's the other way around!
Fender_Uk said:2x in 1080p mode and 4x in 720p
GSG Flash said:Although I can't verify FortunateSon's F2 or F3 claims as I haven't played either of those 2 games, there's one thing he is correct about and that is that you are clearly biased towards Forza.
I just find it laughable that both you and kharvey are claiming to be "neutral" but defending Forza and attacking GT on the basis that there's an "imbalance in this trollfest" towards GT :lol
Things would be much simpler for everyone if you two just admitted that you prefer Forza instead of this "balancing the thread" bs.
And there is a lot of trolling against GT that people are turning a blind eye against. Posts like
are just as much of a troll as the Forza trolling.
pseudocaesar said:If I were I would be quite the pillock now wouldn't I. I love this thread, its the best entertainment we have had on gaf since the slim rumour thread.
Iknos said:Guesswho said:Graphics: GT5 > Forza 3
Everything Else: Forza 3 > GT5
Winner Forza 3. It's so simple.
I agree with that and so do many sim racing fans. How is that a troll?
K' Dash said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jr2us7TpKqI - ya that speaks for itselfZaptruder said:Everything else Forza 3 is better than GT5, without qualification or detail, and somehow that's not a troll to you?
Uh FM3 is being massively hyped. It got one of the biggest e3 presentations by far (why do you think people keep harping on Definitive? Because there was so much of it.) PGR 4 had no equivalent hype. No weekly (and now daily) dev reports, no expo car giveaway extravaganzas, etc. It is a major release from MS.Class_A_Ninja said:It traumatized me, and I watch this thread barely holding back from talking crap on Forza 3. The crazy PS3 people are former xbox people who have been wronged.
My problem with Forza is that it coulda been somebody. On the eve of the launch of Forza 2, it seemed like a real franchise that could compete in hype circles with GT. Forza 3, aside from the diehards in this thread, has about as much hype as PGR4. It's a game made by a developer that couldn't move on. Even when it became apparent that their franchise was no longer really needed, they still made the same damn game and soon will release it to thousands of chirping crickets. One Forza was all this gen needed, and they didn't take advantage of their opportunity.
This is all independent of quality. It's a fine game, but we had our fill this gen. It's kind of like Fight Night 4, which I own and love. It just isn't the same thing the second time around. Yet, we have to listen to the developer say definitive, definitive, definitive. That is something consumers get to decide.
Iknos said:So you feel this way because I have responded to BS claims about FM2 and FM3? Like when I pointed out the pic of the blue Mazda was not of the finished product...that made me biased for Forza?
Or when I pointed out that the windows weren't black...I'm biased?
I suspect you feel that way because of statements like the following...
I agree with that and so do many sim racing fans. How is that a troll?
lol so angry. And what are you doing masking your pent up rage anyway? Show the world how you truly feel!Zaptruder said:From the legions of brainwashed xbox fuckwits who can't even tell that they're been shills. Obnoxious enough to feign objectivity all while glowing bright fucking green
Zaptruder said:From the legions of brainwashed xbox fuckwits who can't even tell that they're been shills. Obnoxious enough to feign objectivity all while glowing bright fucking green
adelante said:lol so angry. And what are you doing masking your pent up rage anyway? Show the world how you truly feel!
cyberheater said:Agreed. Very funny in parts although it does give you an insight what a terrible and wondrous place this would be if all the threads were this unmoderated.
Iknos said:They do.
But that hasn't turned Xbox fans into irrational PS3 hating retards who are clinically batshit insane.
And that's what we've seen in this thread from the "GT supporters". Batshit Insanity.
skybaby said:You don't have to go back that far. We're seeing it right now!
Pre-damage: damage sucks, it's about pristine car porn!
Post-damage: take that forza, our damage is much better haha!
:lol
As if the thread needs more drama queens...cmon now, you brought up some good points, all it needs is to sound less "high-strung". Only then you'd actually appear to have a civil discussion with Iknos! =DZaptruder said:The mask isn't designed to hide so much as it is for 'dramatic pause.'
License tests are probably the best part of the GT series...you're out of your mind.Son of Godzilla said:I never knew sim racers had gameplay, I thought they were just advanced diagnostic tools for treating OCD. From all I've heard about previous GT's stupid ass license/timetrial/howthefuckisthisagame systems and Forza's insane fucking 19 lap races around the same seven tracks while pretending randomized restrictions somehow makes it all new content, it's no wonder that the fans of such shit care enough to actually bitch at each other over rear window transparancy differences or the lack of fucking imperial units on a dashboard.
Son of Godzilla said:I never knew sim racers had gameplay, I thought they were just advanced diagnostic tools for treating OCD. From all I've heard about previous GT's stupid ass license/timetrial/howthefuckisthisagame systems and Forza's insane fucking 19 lap races around the same seven tracks while pretending randomized restrictions somehow makes it all new content, it's no wonder that the fans of such shit care enough to actually bitch at each other over rear window transparancy differences or the lack of fucking imperial units on a dashboard.
Cat in the Hat said:troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll troll
Is that all you dipshits say?
You're so biased you don't even realize the repeated use of screenshots and gifs that misrepresent these games can't be attributed to GT fans only. And why stop at gifs and screenshots? Another part of the problem are words... Just look at Iknos; he thinks claiming Forza 3 is better than GT5 in every department (excluding graphics) though he didn't play GT5, is not trolling.KHarvey16 said:If "GT5 is better than FM3" was the extent of the comments here I don't think anyone would have a problem. The problem is repeated use of screenshots and gifs that misrepresent and articles attributed to sources and given an authority they don't deserve. These things have been very clearly and fairly pointed out to be BS yet they keep appearing. If the things I listed were removed this thread might be 5 pages long.
Just plain opinions make for an actual discussion and maybe even an interesting thread.
D'ultimate said:So I'm not the only one who sees this. Its just months ago the GT camp was all "damage suxxors". Now they're all fapping to it.
While at Nurburgring, Yamauchi said he was approached by countless GT fans, who asked him why he was adding damage to the series. "For many fans I spoke with," Yamauchi explained, "one reason they seemed to like Gran Turismo is that you cannot damage cars." The decision to include damage apparently was based on looking at what was missing from the franchise. Currently the development of car damage is at about 50 percent work on it was begun two months ago.
The increasing number of driving simulators is not a bad thing. "I think it's great that the racing game market is getting bigger," said Yamauchi. "It's like if you are a rock fan, you'd like there to be more rock groups. Same idea. That being said, we don't view Gran Turismo as competing with those other titles. We are competing with ourselves."
BenjaminBirdie said:Uh FM3 is being massively hyped. It got one of the biggest e3 presentations by far (why do you think people keep harping on Definitive? Because there was so much of it.) PGR 4 had no equivalent hype. No weekly (and now daily) dev reports, no expo car giveaway extravaganzas, etc. It is a major release from MS.
Zaptruder said:From the legions of brainwashed xbox fuckwits who can't even tell that they're been shills. Obnoxious enough to feign objectivity all while glowing bright fucking green
[Nintex] said:Guys it's Forza 3 vs. Gran Turismo 5.
Not:
Sony fans vs. Microsoft fans vs. Pacifists battle Royale extravaganza
Oh yeah forgot about that gemmentalfloss said:fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy
fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy
fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy
fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy
fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy fanboy
I doubt that a bundle has any impact on a series. I mean, there have been plenty of Mario bundles and Gran Turismo 4 was the free PS2 game in Europe.Class_A_Ninja said:Yeah, but I'm thinking the equivalent is if someone really tried to push PGR4. People still wouldn't care, no matter how much you talked about it. It isn't like Microsoft has a lot of inhouse developed games to show off right now.
I guess we'll see if it is turns out to be a huge fall release. I think a lot of disservice was done to the franchise by making it the default free game for a long time. I don't think there is much mystique left in the series.
I wonder what console Glenn Beck supports, my guess is Xbox 360 because it isn't from "Yurop or Communist Asia". Or is Project Natal the framework that Obama will activate to rule the world? It does have Project in the name... hmmmmentalfloss said:Wow. That's some Glenn Beck kind of retarded angst right there.
shuyin_ said:You're so biased you don't even realize the repeated use of screenshots and gifs that misrepresent these games can't be attributed to GT fans only.
shuyin_ said:And why stop at gifs and screenshots? Another part of the problem are words... Just look at Iknos; he thinks claiming Forza 3 is better than GT5 in every department (excluding graphics) though he didn't play GT5, is not trolling.
shuyin_ said:Oh, and the least thing we need is a preacher that is first when it comes to 'who used the world <troll> more'. If i were you, i would have thought twice before posting.
Duh! The whole (hidden) point of this thread was to draw in as many fanboys and then in one fell swoop, ban them all that've posted in here (more than 10 times is a reasonable enough measure for suspect motives). Sorta like a purge...Shogun PaiN said:Maybe its just me but there seems to be real N4G quality to this thread. Wouldn't be surprised to find that a number of posters in here in fact came from that site.
spyshagg said:GT5: Prologue with G25 in simulator mode.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh2_kF_2l2U
[Nintex] said:Forza 3 is one of the biggest Microsoft releases of this year and has little competition in october. The Xbox 360's userbase is bigger as well.
Its not about seeing damage...its more about crashing having an impact on your performance and preventing people from using other cars as a means to take a turn.Ploid 3.0 said:A lot of gt fans don't care for damage still. Well not cosmetic damage, the kind that take the focus off of the game. Even Kaz.Y thinks it's insignificant, "damage is such a small part of racing" (paraphrase). When you race correctly you'll barely have a chance to see any damage. For example when there was a rumor that damage was in the Gamescom demo, people started telling Blim to stop playing correctly and damage the car. Stupid.
Iknos has been one of the few posters here trying to be objective. He's simply trying to respond to inaccurate information, which in this thread so far has been overwhelmingly been one-sided. He has cleared up GT inaccuracies as well, but those haven't been nearly as bad in comparison.GSG Flash said:No, it's more of your unequivocal defending of Forza mixed with potshots at GT5 that make me feel this way, I thought that would've been obvious.
XiaNaphryz said:As for the potshots, it seems he's done this more on the posters than on the game itself, which is understandable given the complete cesspool this thread is. To the crazy contingent here, if you make any attempt at "defending" Forza even if it's just correcting a simple inaccuracy you're instantly branded as being on that "side" and are clearly a fanboy. It's absurd.