I'd be curious to know what your stance was on the GT series not having damage before, and if you were this opposed to a sim, supposedly the "real" sim of sims, not having it and if you were this vocal about it on gaf. Because everything that's being argued now against rewind, actually fits as a better argument towards a sim not having damage. The lack of damage can make drivers sloppy, can artificially increase lap times and be abused and can make a game "arcadey".
At least in rewind you redo the corner until you learn to take it right, whereas the lack of damage in GT nefarious players just plowed through corners, careening off walls and went on their way.
I'm not calling you out, but I have a feeling there are a few hypocrites in this thread that are just making arguments for and against based on prejudices and bias.