SovanJedi said:Not that I would like to question such things (since I like Mario games and consider Galaxy to be the best game I played in years) but I wonder why Mario hasn't suffered the same fatigue that Final Fantasy has?
It could be the perceived quality value, but I imagine that for all its rehashing Final Fantasy still holds a strong perception of quality assurance, almost as well as Mario does... So could it be that despite the similarity of certain releases (i.e. the Mario Parties, Mario sports titles and Galaxy to Mario 64/Sunshine) they are at least perceived as new entries over a very wide spectrum of gaming genres, whereas Final Fantasy is focused mostly on porting and remaking previous entries in its almost entirely standard RPG-only back catalogue?
Or maybe people generally feel that Mario games are more fun to play than the average Final Fantasy game. I certainly don't think FF games are nearly as fun to play as Mario, though I'm admittedly not a big fan of the series compared to other RPGs like Dragon Quest. I also question whether Final Fantasy ever really achieved the same level of popularity that Mario has or the cultural familiarity. When kids recognize Mario easier than they do Mickey Mouse, it's no wonder that his visage continues to draw interest whilst the Final Fantasy franchise's constantly changing lineup doesn't.