flyinpiranha said:
I'm not saying that EVERY person uses HD on their TV's but we completely underestimate the "wow" factor people get in a store.
No, you just have the ignorant idea in your head that people are wowed by tiny pixels and accurate picture reproduction when actually it's well-proven that what wows people at the store is a) flatness, b) wideness, and c) face-melting brightness.
jvm said:
I bet most of those people have digital cable.
Yup. Of course, part of the reason is that cable companies purposely fudged the lines, knowing that people would make this mistake.
In my experience, most HDTVs in houses of people above 30 are not correctly configured to receive HD signals from things unless the person is an AV nerd or they've had a person under 30 configure it for them; most people over 30 will more often than not select the wrong version of the channel (via the "lower numbers are better/easier to remember" rule of thumb) unless a young person has trained them carefully to do otherwise.
Cheech said:
If they do it quickly, and at least a year before anyone else, they could very well put Sony (and possibly MS) out of the console business.
I don't get your ordering here. Sony has more skin in the game than Microsoft and much more reason to tough it out in the console world when the going gets tough.
I know some of this is wishful thinking on my part; Nintendo's interest seems to be going after customers who haven't previously picked up a gaming controller more than the hardcore gamers.
That's certainly not a very accurate description of their 3DS strategy.
farnham said:
2012 japan and 2013 worldwide seems to be more likely
Not to anyone who's seriously thought it through.
Mrbob said:
I'm trying to figure out how Nintendo can effectively bring over the typical 360 and PS3 gamer at this point, because I don't see it.
Imagine gamers as a pyramid. There are a shitton of extremely casual gamers who buy like one game a year at the bottom and a tiny peak of ultra-hardcore players who buy 50 games a year at the top, and then a wide range in between.
Between them, the 360 and PS3 have narrowed in on the hardcore market at the very top of the pyramid, the people who buy tons of games and accessories and DLC and so on, while Nintendo have captured the very bottom, and both of them have kind of left the middle part open.
Nintendo's correct strategy for next-gen is to go after that middle, which is like ten thousand times easier to capture working from the bottom up (as they successfully did on DS, and are advancing further on with 3DS) than from the top down.
Chris1964 said:
I try to understand where this comes from. Japan will be possibly the only region this year that Wii won't decline.
Wii went from selling outrageously well to selling okay to selling kind of poorly very early on in its lifespan Japan and since then has managed to maintain consistently mediocre numbers that are above its worst point, while in the US it sold "well" for ages and just now is declining. So its actual local delta is trending downwards in the US and steady or very slightly upwards in Japan, but its been off its game for a while in Japan.
Sho_Nuff82 said:
Nintendo's hesitation on a serious storage solution and an online infrastructure of any kind are probably its biggest limitations on grabbing the other half of the console marketshare, not HD.
This is definitely true.