hans_castorp
Member
It's like "what if Suikoden didn't go to shit and kept expanding?"
*Head-pats* 108 stars
It's like "what if Suikoden didn't go to shit and kept expanding?"
Looking at that tweet, is there a Kiseki or Falcom Discord?
ALSO WHAT
Just saw an offhand comment in the threat about Falcom's floppy disks that they put a lot of stuff on iTunes and Spotify
https://open.spotify.com/artist/5WFofzgRxpVNkpwg9XRSdg
This needs to be in the OP. Listening to some Sora no Kiseki tunes!
It starts off like a decently enjoyable, leisurely saturday cartoon and mostly gets better from there. Might seem a bit light and cliched at first but even then there's a bit more substance to it than your usual JRPGs. The characters are likable & have depth even if drawing from much used tropes (which they usually grow at least partly past of). It is a somewhat slow burn and starts off really small scale, so if you expect or want bombastic epicness & melodrama on the level of some FFs and Xenoblades all the time, you're gonna be disappointed.After hearing so much positive talk about Trails in the Sky I decided I had to find out what the fuss was about. I'm about 10 hours into the first game, in chapter 2, and so far I don't get it. Am I just not to the good stuff yet? At this point in chapter 2 it seems very generic in story and characterization. Pretty much all the dialogue feels more or less like stuff I've seen in a dozen Japanese RPGs before.
I'm having an okay time with it, but nothing stands out.
I was very much in the same boat as you are right now. It took me two years to get through Trails in the Sky FC because it didn't click until late in the game. Then I played through its six sequels back-to-back within a year, and then started over again.After hearing so much positive talk about Trails in the Sky I decided I had to find out what the fuss was about. I'm about 10 hours into the first game, in chapter 2, and so far I don't get it. Am I just not to the good stuff yet? At this point in chapter 2 it seems very generic in story and characterization. Pretty much all the dialogue feels more or less like stuff I've seen in a dozen Japanese RPGs before.
I'm having an okay time with it, but nothing stands out.
After hearing so much positive talk about Trails in the Sky I decided I had to find out what the fuss was about. I'm about 10 hours into the first game, in chapter 2, and so far I don't get it. Am I just not to the good stuff yet? At this point in chapter 2 it seems very generic in story and characterization. Pretty much all the dialogue feels more or less like stuff I've seen in a dozen Japanese RPGs before.
I'm having an okay time with it, but nothing stands out.
Apart from what everyone has said, I kinda want to ask HOW you're approaching the game. Are you rushing through it, just mostly playing the general story beats or are you exploring the world while taking your time? I've seen many go into the mindset of an epic tale with twists and payoffs frequently, often forgetting to stop and relax. It's kinda rude, I realize, but Trails is a series that gets better when you approach it right.After hearing so much positive talk about Trails in the Sky I decided I had to find out what the fuss was about. I'm about 10 hours into the first game, in chapter 2, and so far I don't get it. Am I just not to the good stuff yet? At this point in chapter 2 it seems very generic in story and characterization. Pretty much all the dialogue feels more or less like stuff I've seen in a dozen Japanese RPGs before.
I'm having an okay time with it, but nothing stands out.
Just saw an offhand comment in the threat about Falcom's floppy disks that they put a lot of stuff on iTunes and Spotify
https://open.spotify.com/artist/5WFofzgRxpVNkpwg9XRSdg
This needs to be in the OP. Listening to some Sora no Kiseki tunes!
On the flipside I just started too and I'm really digging it. I like how light hearted and kind of restrained it is so far. The game does a good job at hinting at something bigger, with airships and conspiracies and political coup and ancient towers, but right now I'm just in my hometown doing my job.
Though I am taking it really slow. 9 hours in and I just finished the prologue. I don't skip any fights but most importantly I talk to pretty much everybody everytime something happens. They always have something new to say about the present situation, it's kind of crazy (and time consuming).
I'm still largely confused about the Orbment system though.
I finally caved and got this.
My first and last nendroid.
Thanks for the feedback! Same for everyone else who responded. My main concern was that a lot of the comments about Trails having an amazing story may have come from people who just really like JRPGs in general. And I loved those kinds of stories as a teenager but don't have much tolerance for them these days, so I need genuinely deep and interesting characters or an amazing combat system or world to make me want to play. So far none of those things have been present. It's been decently fun to play, but when there are so many other games out there it's hard to commit 100 hours to one that doesn't get interesting for 70 of them, or whatever. I'll probably keep going with it for awhile at least.It starts off like a decently enjoyable, leisurely saturday cartoon and mostly gets better from there. Might seem a bit light and cliched at first but even then there's a bit more substance to it than your usual JRPGs. The characters are likable & have depth even if drawing from much used tropes (which they usually grow at least partly past of). It is a somewhat slow burn and starts off really small scale, so if you expect or want bombastic epicness & melodrama on the level of some FFs and Xenoblades all the time, you're gonna be disappointed.
You do have to have some tolerance for some usual anime/JRPG tropes to enjoy all the Kiseki games but eventually they do often manage to bring some genuinely good stuff out of it all, sooner or later. Like Trails in the Sky has a romance that at first feels like your typical teenage romance thing but by the end of Sky SC it's probably one of my favorite game romances because as cliched & teenager-y as it can be in many regards, when it really matters the writing is on point and the game is surprisingly mature about it.Thanks for the feedback! Same for everyone else who responded. My main concern was that a lot of the comments about Trails having an amazing story may have come from people who just really like JRPGs in general. And I loved those kinds of stories as a teenager but don't have much tolerance for them these days, so I need genuinely deep and interesting characters or an amazing combat system or world to make me want to play. So far none of those things have been present. It's been decently fun to play, but when there are so many other games out there it's hard to commit 100 hours to one that doesn't get interesting for 70 of them, or whatever. I'll probably keep going with it for awhile at least.
Deep and interesting characters are there, but as everyone else has said, it's a slow burn requiring a great deal of investment to see where things are going with said characters and the overarching story. Combat is much better in Trails of Cold Steel, particularly Cold Steel II.Thanks for the feedback! Same for everyone else who responded. My main concern was that a lot of the comments about Trails having an amazing story may have come from people who just really like JRPGs in general. And I loved those kinds of stories as a teenager but don't have much tolerance for them these days, so I need genuinely deep and interesting characters or an amazing combat system or world to make me want to play. So far none of those things have been present. It's been decently fun to play, but when there are so many other games out there it's hard to commit 100 hours to one that doesn't get interesting for 70 of them, or whatever. I'll probably keep going with it for awhile at least.
For what it's worth, FC is the slowest burn in the entire series. It didn't click for me until over halfway through.
For what it's worth, FC is the slowest burn in the entire series. It didn't click for me until over halfway through.
After hearing so much positive talk about Trails in the Sky I decided I had to find out what the fuss was about. I'm about 10 hours into the first game, in chapter 2, and so far I don't get it. Am I just not to the good stuff yet? At this point in chapter 2 it seems very generic in story and characterization. Pretty much all the dialogue feels more or less like stuff I've seen in a dozen Japanese RPGs before.
I'm having an okay time with it, but nothing stands out.
Trails the 3rd is only coming to PC, right? I became an instant diehard of this franchise after playing FC and SC for the first time late last year, but alas, I only own a Chromebook right now as far as computers are concerned. I suppose I can hunt down a used laptop for like a hundred bucks or something; I can't imagine the specs are substantial here at all.
DualShockers got an early copy of Trails in the Sky the 3rd and wrote up a quick preview. Seems they like it. Some light spoilers for the prologue chapter.
It runs on a toaster. Here's the Recommended specs:
OS: Windows Vista or later (64-bit supported)
Processor: Core 2 Duo 2GHz or higher
Memory: 1 GB RAM
Graphics: 64 MB VRAM, 3D accelerator compatible w/ DirectX 9.0c
DirectX: Version 9.0c
Storage: 6 GB available space
Sound Card: Compatible with DirectX 9.0c
It runs on a toaster. Here's the Recommended specs:
OS: Windows Vista or later (64-bit supported)
Processor: Core 2 Duo 2GHz or higher
Memory: 1 GB RAM
Graphics: 64 MB VRAM, 3D accelerator compatible w/ DirectX 9.0c
DirectX: Version 9.0c
Storage: 6 GB available space
Sound Card: Compatible with DirectX 9.0c
Seems questionable to suggest that it's "probably okay to start with," even though they don't fully recommend it. But I haven't played 3rd so maybe that's not totally wrong. Just seems like it would be counter-intuitive to start with a game that at least partially functions as an epilogue, and is the most difficult game in the trilogy (or series? I think I've seen that suggested).
Seems questionable to suggest that it's "probably okay to start with," even though they don't fully recommend it. But I haven't played 3rd so maybe that's not totally wrong. Just seems like it would be counter-intuitive to start with a game that at least partially functions as an epilogue, and is the most difficult game in the trilogy (or series? I think I've seen that suggested).
Seems questionable to suggest that it's "probably okay to start with," even though they don't fully recommend it. But I haven't played 3rd so maybe that's not totally wrong.
Looks like FC and SC have been patched. RIP, Zane.
Who is this Zane you speak of?
brb modding my game to reflect thisI think they call him eggman now.
*Head-pats* 108 stars
I was very much in the same boat as you are right now. It took me two years to get through Trails in the Sky FC because it didn't click until late in the game. Then I played through its six sequels back-to-back within a year, and then started over again.
Just know that once it clicks, you're hooked.
Haha, that's right. I bought my PSP for Persona 2: Innocent Sin, which was sold in a bundle alongside Trails in the Sky. I didn't like Persona 2 and gave 'that generic looking RPG' a shot. Funny how these things go. omgfloofy and Yotaka have been following the series since its inception, though.Wait a so I was playing Kiseki before you were? FC was late out on EU PSN but I remember it was around the time I was seeing Ao launching in Japan. Always assumed you were one of the die hard few who'd been playing since 2004. Must have been an awesome (and exhausting!) year going through them all like that.
So I was expecting to not like Millium that much but her energy is pretty infectious
I don't hate Millium as much as before now because Altina exists.