Redbeard said:
Nintendo can't just release a Wii 2 that is simply a Wii with HD (see: PS360 level graphics), and somehow expect success from that.
Errr... if Nintendo were going to release a new console, why would it only have PS360 level graphics?
It wouldn't be hard for Nintendo to design a machine that outclasses both, and get the de facto 'superior version' of every third party game out there.
Redbeard said:
Sony and Microsoft have much of that territory covered (the hardcore games market), and simply adapting to the competition will yield the same level of success they received in the gamecube days.
I don't think Microsoft are in the position to be actively moneyhatting developers to release the GC version of titles last so that the Xbox received less competition, as happened then.
I also don't think Microsoft OR Sony are in the position to have a new console on the market within 2 years time, as the guesstimated timeframe for a WiiHD to appear would be.
It is not beyind the realms of possibility that Nintendo will announce a WiiHD, with superior tech specs to either PS3 or 360, at next years E3 / Spaceworld for release in 2012 and entirely snap up the next generation with first mover advanatge while Ms and Sony are still trying to play catch up by grabbing the audience the current Wii
already has.
Redbeard said:
There's essentially two types of Wii owners: the Nintendo faithful (the "GameCube" audience), and their expanded casual market.
The latter is far bigger than the former, and by going the Wii HD route, they will be attracting a small segment of their current userbase.
Not this shit again.
Nintendo has ONE audience it is chasing, and it is THE SAME AUDIENCE that Microsoft and Sony are chasing; people
willing to spend money on computer games.
It is entirely futile trying to package up consumers into marketing-friendly categories.
Redbeard said:
Nintendo is going to have much difficulty finding new ways to engage new audiences, because this is the only way for them to see repeats of the Wii's peak days in the future with successive consoles. Simply going the more powerful route isn't going to do them well at all compared to Sony and Microsoft. The next few years for them will be really interesting.
Why wouldn't it?
The people who actively jizz themselves into a frenzy everytime Digital Foundry posts a face off would refuse to buy a console with an extremely clearcut 'superior version' of every title
just because its on a Nintendo console?
People who consider themselves to be 'hardcore' would actively not want a console that has all of the third party titles worth having (and this gen has become all about third parties) in addition to whatever Nintendo make?
Seriously, how the fuck are people automatically falling back into their 'nintendo are doomed' mindsets now? Are 'gamers' really so conservative and bitter that they want Nintendo to fail so badly? As Nintendo are coming off of one of the most successful consoles ever made, with the most successful handheld ever made at what in any other gen would be approaching the end of its natural lifespan?