1 euro = >1.50 USDHunahan said:What doesn't change is that there is a 20% gross revenue gap between the two options. That's a lot bigger than people give it credit for.
donny2112 said:Actual
Post full of awesomeness.
Huh, it wouldn't be more, just the current number of them.Andrex said:NO. NO MORE FUCKING SKUs.
Two is more than enough, goddamnit.
mugwhump said:I think you're slightly underestimating the cost difference. From what developers have said, HD games are more like 2-4 times more expensive.
norinrad21 said:The HD situation is slowly turning into an abyss.:lol
mio said:Huh, it wouldn't be more, just the current number of them.
But fine then, ditch the pointless* Elite and step up the Premium to 60GB and there you go.
A low entry level barebones SKU and a well ballanced, well priced top SKU.
*inb4 bububu my Elite's HDD is already full etc
Vilix said:HD Gaming? Yes.
HDTV? No.
Seriously though, I hear HDTV sales are pretty strong. Even for this economy.
Hunahan said:I guess the thing that always surprises me about the way that people on this board react to sales numbers is that all that seems to matter is quantity sold.
To me, that seems like a pretty narrow lens to view sales numbers through.
In response to your RE theoretical, the Wii version (at $50) would only need 160k in sales to break even, whereas the HD version (at $60) would need 800k in sales to break even. That's a mighty big gap.Hunahan said:Profits made last generation are irrelevant. What matters is what their options are for making money right now.
And GTA has already made that 100 million back.
More related to the point, they've already sold ~4.16 million units in the NA region alone.
Estimate the rest of the world by what we've been told and include shipping totals rather than retail, and we're easily looking at $70million gross above what it would have done on the Wii at $50.
Either way, I think everyone here can easily admit that GTA is an exception to the rule when it comes to game budgets, on Wii, HD consoles, or wherever. It's not a great example to use for budget.
I know you're not going to try and argue that Rockstar would have put out GTA:Wii for less than 10 million bucks, right. So I don't really understand the point.
All right.
I'll even give you the lowball estimate.
At 4 million sales for the next Resident Evil game, the difference in game-budget could be 40million dollars and it would still break even between the two options.
So you could take this ridiculously low 8 million dollar budgetted Resident Evil Wii game, and compare it directly with a blockbuster 48million budgetted Ps3/360 game and they will generate the same revenue.
That's a damning statement for break-even considering the relative size of userbases right now. Especially since I can tell you right now that in terms of damaging your brand, a cheap-o 8 million dollar RE main series title would seriously hurt their next title.
"Double" means nothing.
What kind of numbers are they talking about. What kind of games.
250k vs. 500k?
500k vs. 1m?
1m vs. 2m?
Depending on the scale of the game, that "double" is going to be a very different feat of accomplishment.
And, honestly, if all you have to do is sell two times as many copies of Soul Calibur 4 as you did of Soul Calibur Legends, then big deal. They'll do that in their sleep.
Namco has said a lot of things.
They are all too vague to be taken seriously.
What doesn't change is that there is a 20% gross revenue gap between the two options. That's a lot bigger than people give it credit for.
Vilix said:HD Gaming? Yes.
HDTV? No.
Seriously though, I hear HDTV sales are pretty strong. Even for this economy.
Gaborn said:Yeah, but this is a gaming forum, not an electronics forum. even if you believe Sony's overall strategy was to push blu-ray at the expense of the PS3 if necessary and even if you acknowledge that Blu-ray, as the prevailing HD format has a bright future... it's utterly irrelevant to THIS discussion because THIS discussion is about the tradeoff Sony made, and they seem to have sacrificed the PS3 to mediocre sales.
They don't sell games in Europe all of a sudden? What are you talking about?mio said:1 euro = >1.50 USD
Prices in europe = replace the currency, keep the number of the american ones. Which means companies get 50% more income for each game sold.
And still they don't seem to give a fuck.
I didn't ignore costs during process at all. I addressed that in full.mio said:I don't know man, you're pushing very hard a far fetched theory, ignoring costs during the process and the increasingly larger and larger Wii SW sales pushed by larger HW sales and a consequent closing gap to the PS3+360 LTD. At this rate we'll see in the not so distant future more than the currently already great number of 5 Wii titles in the top 10, let alone the top 30.
It's almost like you were in a famous river that runs in egypt.
Vilix said:Umm....okay?
Wollan said:It doesn't say in the OP but is there a reason for no PS2 numbers?
Gaborn said:Yeah, but this is a gaming forum, not an electronics forum. even if you believe Sony's overall strategy was to push blu-ray at the expense of the PS3 if necessary and even if you acknowledge that Blu-ray, as the prevailing HD format has a bright future... it's utterly irrelevant to THIS discussion because THIS discussion is about the tradeoff Sony made, and they seem to have sacrificed the PS3 to mediocre sales.
OokieSpookie said:The thing about that is, the games are what has hurt sony and nothing else.
Hell the rumor peeks of a blu ray drive for the 360 and people get hard ons saying "omg ill buy it!" just like everything else.
HDMI?
Not needed they insisted but oddly enough it is pretty standard.
Wireless?
Large network downloads?
Now blu ray.
If Sony had come out of the gate with big named games and had their shit straight with devs from day one 599 would not have been an issue.
Without blu the PS3 would not sell half as many units as they do now.
Even if they had released a non blu ray unit at launch for a lower price with the games that were released and hell even the games that they have now they would STILL be in the position that they are in only WITHOUT the boost from blu.
Even this far in Sony still seems to be clueless about games and devs, and it will continue to hold them back until they get their shit straight.
watership said:3rd place... for May?
ABANDON SHIP! CANCEL EVERYTHING!
If Sony had come out of the gate with big named games and had their shit straight with devs from day one 599 would not have been an issue.
Even if they had released a non blu ray unit at launch for a lower price with the games that were released and hell even the games that they have now they would STILL be in the position that they are in only WITHOUT the boost from blu.
abysmal, irrelevant, not important.Count Dookkake said::lol
What does that make the HD numbers?
yoopoo said:Because showing this kind of emotion isn't easily translated into text...
mugwhump said:I think you're slightly underestimating the cost difference. From what developers have said, HD games are more like 2-4 times more expensive.
norinrad21 said:
:lol :lol :lol
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Wollan said:It doesn't say in the OP but is there a reason for no PS2 numbers?
norinrad21 said:Whats going to be the next 3rd party excuse?
Green Tentacle said:"How appropriate, you fight like a cow."
:lolDrForester said:Wii + DS:
PS3+360+PSP
lambchop said:looks like gta4 did drive ps3 sales more than 360 ... that's pretty telling ... new console owners going forward are most likly to be buying ps3's
i mean if a mainstream title like GTA can't be a then indicator for that then what can?
should see an even bigger gap between 360 and ps3 next mth thanks to MGS4 80GB packin
RagnarokX said:And Wii keeps on going.
CartridgeBlower said:Should we maybe stop looking at PS3 and the X360 as some type of failures, but rather the Wii as some super-anomaly success?
Honestly, what if the Wii didn't exist right now? Would these hardware sales be on par with past generations, month to month that is? Say the original Playstation or the Nintendo 64? Or are they really that bad? (Not counting the PS2, which was the Wii of it's generation).
See, there is always one.
And it doesn't mean that one will dictate the future (hence PS3's dropoff from PS2).
Because part of me is thinking many people here are overreacting about the Wii's success. Yes, it's doing great. End of HD gaming? Give me a f'ing break.
People still think Wii is an anomaly?CartridgeBlower said:Should we maybe stop looking at PS3 and the X360 as some type of failures, but rather the Wii as some super-anomaly success?
Honestly, what if the Wii didn't exist right now? Would these hardware sales be on par with past generations, month to month that is? Say the original Playstation or the Nintendo 64? Or are they really that bad? (Not counting the PS2, which was the Wii of it's generation).
Because there is always one. That super console that destroys everything else during it's generation.
And it doesn't mean that one will dictate the future (hence PS3's dropoff from PS2).
Part of me is thinking many people here are overreacting about the Wii's success. Yes, it's doing great. End of HD gaming? Give me a f'ing break.