Just LOL... I knew you'd come out with some weird excuses why all these other (and there are many more from lots of developers) are somehow OK..
I'd never excuse what T10 have done, but in terms of marketing accuracy it's totally par for the course (sadly), to actually attack them vociferously about it, and worse, defend others for doing the same thing really shows a very irrational and slanted view on proceedings.
I'd never excuse what T10 have done, but in terms of marketing accuracy it's totally par for the course (sadly), to actually attack them vociferously about it, and worse, defend others for doing the same thing really shows a very irrational and slanted view on proceedings.
Doc Evils said:"Do we chastise the KZ2 CGI being passed as in-game?"
Guerrilla did deliver on the graphics department, no one can argue that and put backbenchers at rest.
"Do we baulk every time KY gives us a 'future of GT' presentation that is pie in the sky, or promises 'GT5p will have damage' that never appears, or 'GT4 online' that wasn't..?
KY did over promise during the PS2 era and got his fair share of smack, but again this generation with GT5 he will be delivering damage and car rolls. we already saw the early damage with the Subaru.
The developer that you mention that has lied has been called out and they have delivered or will be delivering, what makes Turn 10 special to be excluded from this criticism?