OverHeat
« generous god »
Jag22 said:She's not 10, she's a porn star.
Edit.
OMG she is.......sick she look like a kid.
Jag22 said:She's not 10, she's a porn star.
batbeg said:![]()
Why... why do you have the avatar of what looks like a 10 year old girl? Please tell me this isn't meant to be a grown woman.
Opiate said:Sony and Microsoft cannot just drop the prices of these consoles indefinitely. Particularly in the case of Sony, you can't just keep lopping hundreds of dollars off at a time. Sony and Microsoft have lost billions -- literally billions -- of dollars already trying to get these things into people's homes. There is a limit. This is about money. It has to end.
I think many people in here simply disassociate marketshare and gaming completely from economic realities. For example, for many people, the reason they prefer the PS3 and 360 in the first place was that they were more powerful systems, and that is the exact reason why they cost so much money. If the PS3 and 360 launched at lower prices, they would have also been much less powerful systems. In which case you probably wouldn't have liked them in the first place.
As a person who frequents a great deal of technically oriented forums, this isn't a malady particular to gaming afficianados. Whatever the cutting edge of technology is in any market sector, there is a small, technophile group that insists that if [insert high tech device here] was 100 dollars, it would be outselling [insert low tech device here]. Which is true, of course, but the reason it costs so much more is because it's so high tech.
And when the product in question finally reaches that 100 dollar level, it's no longer high tech anymore. It's now the low tech product. Something new has been created that costs a ton of money, and now the technophile crowd is insisting that the new product would be outselling the now-old product if it was 100 dollars, too.
The conversation is completely disassociated from economics and reality.
batbeg said:![]()
Why... why do you have the avatar of what looks like a 10 year old girl? Please tell me this isn't meant to be a grown woman.
Wow.Kandrick said::lol :lol
Why hate Nintendo ? If anything you should hate MS and Sony.
Didnt I tell you last month, that I would be very surprised if GTA beat Halo's opening month. Looks like I was right.MiamiWesker said:Is no one shocked that Halo 3 outsold GTAIV (a few more days of sales yes) in its first week by a good margin. Plus Halo 3 was on one console not two.
The numbers for GTAIV are very disappointing.
j-wood said:That's just it man. Wii is not gaming to me.
Mithos Yggdrasill said:WTF. Seriously. I can understand your point, but now you're forgetting Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros: two of the best games of this generation (Galaxy still the best for me until now). It's not all crap.
Reilly said:Good.
People. Next-Gen gaming sucks. Patches, $60+ games, shit framerates, shitty EVERYTHING.
715k = minimal?UncleGuito said:No, the hype can last as long as Nintendo wants it to. If they keep sending minimal amounts of Wii's to stores each month, people will continue to snatch them up without even thinking.
There should be millions of them on store shelves.AniHawk said:700,000 is a minimal amount?
Semantic Continuum said:Also, Pokémon Mystery Dungeon ? really ? REALLY ?
Jag22 said:I think there's going to be a 360 price drop very soon.
I'm not sure if Sony can really drop their system anymore.
Since Nintendo is the market leader, maybe they'll starting acting like it and realize the average gamer isn't 10 years old. You know, take away some of the online restrictions (voice chat, screen names, ect), and actually make some new gaming IPs that doesn't revolve around Mario.
Also, hopefully some 3rd party companies start supporting the Wii a little better. Because Capcom has really been the only 3rd party developer consistently making good games for the Wii.
Concept17 said:Yeah, should probly leave them to their celebration.
Instead it had a headstart and (by now) a lower price than Wii. Either way though, Wii is doing even better than the PS2 did.Concept17 said:But the PS2 didn't have a 400 and 350$ consoles to compete with.
Excuse me, but are you retarded?UncleGuito said:If they keep sending minimal amounts of Wii's to stores each month
Oh nevermind, you are.UncleGuito said:If Nintendo fully stocked store shelves and kept up with demand, the hype would decrease, and so would sales (as the Wii becomes more mainstream and people realize that it's no longer a rarity).
duketogo88 said:Wow.
Count Dookkake said:Finished reading the whole thread...
Nothing more bitter than the tears of the hardly-cores.
Get over it. You "lost." You are dinosaurs.
Gaming will be just fine after you pack it up and go home.
So what's the moving goalpost we are supposed to wait for now? Hope springs eternal..
That's the same thing people have been saying for years. "Nintendo makes non-games" is just the substitute for "Nintendo makes kiddy games."Mithos Yggdrasill said:WTF. Seriously. I can understand your point, but now you're forgetting Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros: two of the best games of this generation (Galaxy still the best for me until now). It's not all crap.
DeadGzuz said:As if the $250 GC w/ waggle is better? No thanks, I'll keep my Resistance, Gears, GTA4, GT5P, etc. You can have your slew of Nintendo chars in their 8th interation in SD.
Jokeropia said:Excuse me, but are you retarded?
Not necessarily minimal, but less than they're capable of. Seriously, if Nintendo wanted to, they could push out enough Wii's to satisfy the demand. The Wii costs much less to produce than a PS3/360.pizzaguysrevenge said:715k = minimal?
Excellent points here. Look at OLED panels vs LCD right now.Opiate said:Sony and Microsoft cannot just drop the prices of these consoles indefinitely. Particularly in the case of Sony, you can't just keep lopping hundreds of dollars off at a time. Sony and Microsoft have lost billions -- literally billions -- of dollars already trying to get these things into people's homes. There is a limit. This is about money. It has to end.
I think many people in here simply disassociate marketshare and gaming completely from economic realities. For example, for many people, the reason they prefer the PS3 and 360 in the first place was that they were more powerful systems, and that is the exact reason why they cost so much money. If the PS3 and 360 launched at lower prices, they would have also been much less powerful systems. In which case you probably wouldn't have liked them in the first place.
As a person who frequents a great deal of technically oriented forums, this isn't a malady particular to gaming afficianados. Whatever the cutting edge of technology is in any market sector, there is a small, technophile group that insists that if [insert high tech device here] was 100 dollars, it would be outselling [insert low tech device here]. Which is true, of course, but the reason it costs so much more is because it's so high tech.
And when the product in question finally reaches that 100 dollar level, it's no longer high tech anymore. It's now the low tech product. Something new has been created that costs a ton of money, and now the technophile crowd is insisting that the new product would be outselling the now-old product if it was 100 dollars, too.
The conversation is completely disassociated from economics and reality.
DeadGzuz said:As if the $250 GC w/ waggle is better? No thanks, I'll keep my Resistance, Gears, GTA4, GT5P, etc. You can have your slew of Nintendo chars in their 8th interation in SD.
NeoUltima said:The absolutely insane thing about Wii is that, IIRC, Nintendo was making $100 profit off each unit sold even at launch...They could probably charge $100 for the thing now and still make out great, though most revenues would be from software most likely.
Anyone who still thinks Nintendo won't "win" this gen sales wise is delusional. If a miracle happens and 360 or Ps3 start equaling Wii sales, Nintendo can just drop the Wii to $150 and increase their sales by who knows how much.
_leech_ said:I don't know what's worse: the meltdowns or this shit.
Jag22 said:She's not 10, she's a porn star.
Amazon was added a few months ago, which partly made up for the loss of Toys R' Us.PataHikari said:It does?
I though NPD didn't track online retailers.
I agree . . . lazy port Vice City & San Andreas to the Wii. Let some of those lapsed gamers enjoy some last gen GTA.Im guessing that Rockstar might take a look at the sales now and thinks they should lazy-port GTA games to the Wii.. its a weird thought.
Narcosis said:Oh for crying out loud. 3rd parties are giving Wii games, many of which get ignored by the Wii userbase in general. For all the people bitching that "3rd parties only give the Wii shitty games and ports", how many of those whiners actually went out and bought games like No More Heroes?
So many internet posters spend all their time crying about games like GTA or Bioshock not appearing on the Wii, yet their arguments fall flat because the good games 3rd parties put on the console sell far less than they should given the install base and go virtually ignored.
Maybe instead of bitching and coming up with conspiracy theories about the industry hating the Wii (and all the consoles get shovelware shit, but I know that's gonna be the auto response to my post) these people should notice and play the games right under their damn noses.
Now, as for the NPD numbers, wow, I thought GTA IV would have gave the 360 and PS3 a decent bump. I even guaged my own 360 prediction off of the Halo 3 effect last year. Guess it's time for some Sony and MS price cuts.
Wii seems to have no ceiling in potential, Nintendo should seriously ramp up their manufacturing ASAP.
GTAIV did less than I thought it would on both consoles, MarioKart did about what I expected, GT5 prologue did better than I thought.
Fuzzy said:There should be millions of them on store shelves.
UncleGuito said:Not necessarily minimal, but less than they're capable of. Seriously, if Nintendo wanted to, they could push out enough Wii's to satisfy the demand. The Wii costs much less to produce than a PS3/360.
Edit: Haha, looks like my post may have been for the worst. Damn my hasting wording.
UncleGuito said:Not necessarily minimal, but less than they're capable of. Seriously, if Nintendo wanted to, they could push out enough Wii's to satisfy the demand. The Wii costs much less to produce than a PS3/360.
Edit: Haha, looks like my post may have been for the worst. Damn my hasting wording.
Whew - I was beginning to think "artificial demand" wouldn't show up. :lolUncleGuito said:No, the hype can last as long as Nintendo wants it to. If they keep sending minimal amounts of Wii's to stores each month, people will continue to snatch them up without even thinking.
_leech_ said:I don't know what's worse: the meltdowns or this shit.
Xbox 360 188.0K
PlayStation 3 187.1K
Kandrick said:Whats so wow about it ?
Nintendo is doing their business, and doing it well. Cant hate them for that.
MS and Sony need to step up and come with something.
There was an announcement in one of these threads last year (?) that they were added.PataHikari said:It does?
I though NPD didn't track online retailers.